Thanks Lukas. Will give it a try.
regards Sachin On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Lukas Zeller <l...@plan44.ch> wrote: > Hi Sachin, > > if what you need is just a lot of pure SyncML clients to run against your > server, you might consider using my former employer's free SyncML DEMO client > (see http://www.synthesis.ch/dl_client.php?bp=CLI&pv=&vtag=13). > > Apparently it hasn't been touched since I left there 2010, and it's not > opensource, but is based on the same SyncML engine as used in SyncEvolution, > with the same XML config. It only has a simplistic TAB separated text file > backend. But it is small, simple and can be started from the command line, > including injecting parameters into the XML config (such as different user > names, device ids) via the -D command line option. > > Other people have used this client for creating test loads, so that might > work for you as well. However, that was long time ago, don't ask me about > more details :-) > > Best Regards, > > Lukas > > > > On 29.04.2014, at 19:52, Sachin Gupta <ching...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> one more thing. everytime i invoke syncevolution, it has to load all >> the xmls, build up its data structures, and all the other stuff. >> Can i implement threads in it and run it as a daemon. This will i can >> save time from doing all this. >> >> From within, can i then implement threads and launch multiple sync >> operations? >> >> Can this be done in Syncevo or you foresee issues in this ? >> >> Kindly suggest >> >> Regards >> >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Sachin Gupta <ching...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> yes :) doing some profiling. Will update with the results. >>> >>> How do i maintain the load on the server; 2400 users for an hour? >>> Can JMeter or locust help me in this or i will need custom built >>> scripts for this? >>> >>> Any suggestions? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> >>> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 2014-04-26 at 23:42 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 15:03 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote: >>>>>>> Can you suggest how i can test SyncML Server performance and have 2500 >>>>>>> users/syncevolutions connecting simultaneously? >>>>>> >>>>>> There's no ready-made solution. You'll have to write your own scripts >>>>>> for configuring SyncEvolution and running the desired benchmark. >>>>>> >>>>>> Note that each context in SyncEvolution gets its own device ID. So if >>>>>> you want to simulate n different devices, use: >>>>>> >>>>>> syncevolution --configure ... client-1@client-1 >>>>>> ... >>>>>> syncevolution --configure ... client-n@client-n >>>>>> >>>>> I figured so. So wrote scripts which will launch syncevo each with >>>>> unique device ids and seperate user accounts. >>>>> But the concern is managing these number of syncs through a time >>>>> period. Exploring if JMETER can help me out in this.\ >>>>> Also being a process, it would not be possible to launch so many >>>>> processes in parallel. >>>>> Memory and CPU would be issues, right? Would need very high end >>>>> systems for this? >>>> >>>> I have not measured this. Try it and you'll see. My expection is that >>>> you will need multiple client machines, though. >>>> >>>>> Would it be possible doing this launching processes or shall i look >>>>> into creating threads within the Syncevolution launching and >>>>> controlling sessions from there? >>>> >>>> I would just use multiple client machines. Much simpler and scales >>>> perfectly. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best Regards, Patrick Ohly >>>> >>>> The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although >>>> I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way >>>> represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak >>>> on behalf of Intel on this matter. >>>> >>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
