but that will require a lot of client machines that too of higher configurations.
What we are seeing rt now is high cpu usage (even though for a very short time period). Trying to debug the cause for the same. if i assume that 100 processes can be invoked from one system, then also i need ~24 systems :( Regards On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 23:22 +0530, Sachin Gupta wrote: >> one more thing. everytime i invoke syncevolution, it has to load all >> the xmls, build up its data structures, and all the other stuff. >> Can i implement threads in it and run it as a daemon. This will i can >> save time from doing all this. >> >> From within, can i then implement threads and launch multiple sync >> operations? > > Multithreading is not going to work. You should be able to run a sync > repeatedly in the same process, but reusing the XML loading will require > putting the loop fairly deeply into the SyncEvolution stack (see > SyncContext.cpp). > > I'm still not sure why you want to do this when you can simply use more > client machines. It might safe you some time for setting up a cluster if > (and only if!) you can manage to run all clients from the same machine, > but I have my doubts whether that will be possible. > > -- > Best Regards > > Patrick Ohly > Senior Software Engineer > > Intel GmbH > Open Source Technology Center > Usenerstr. 5a Phone: +49-228-2493652 > 53129 Bonn > Germany > _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
