Jeff McAffer wrote:
> > After getting the proposal out, we now rely on proven
> > Apache processes for working out additional details.
> > Clearly this process has merit, as it has started this dialogue.
> I agree that the process has merit. The fact that your proposal has
> gained great interest is a strong endorsement of the need for Java
> component models and OSGi.
Ok, so this is all good above, but ...
> I guess I would have liked there to have been less haste in
> setting it up and more openness to alternatives now that it
> is incubating.
What openness and alternatives don't you see, and would like to see? As you
noted, the project is incubating here. Eclipse has been invited to
participate. What more is missing?
> To summarize what turned out to be a quite long post (sorry 'bout that),
> we are all for competition and collaboration and look forward to both.
> Lets keep it respectful, factual and technical.
+1
--- Noel
