What are thinking the standard format should be, including updates? Should I assume <distro><version><update>-<arch>, such as:
rhel3u5-ia64 rhel4-ia32 rhel4u2-x86_64 sles9sp2-ia32 suse9.3-x86_64 J- -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard Li Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 3:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Oscar-devel] distro directories Hello: I'd like to propose that all packages provide a directory for each supported distro-arch pair, i.e. the directories under packages/*/distro/ have to be fully qualified as in rhel4-ia64 and we no longer allow things like fc/ or fc-i386/ or rhel4/ etc. Yes, this may mean our tarball will become more bulky, but I think it's just much easier to deal with a standard rather than having so much variations in the naming. If everybody's okay with that, I'd like to start re-organizing ASAP. Thanks, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
