On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Henry Johnson wrote:
> Boy. I solved my problem. The 1 RU units we are using for slave nodes
> have 2 NICs in them. This may not solve Ed's problem, but if he does
> have dual NICs, try moving the ethernet cable to the other one!!
Glad to hear it -- I was re-reading your mail and trying to think what the
heck happened.
> The install worked fine. The chassis of the slave nodes labels the NICs
> 1 and 2, but I guess the sysimager doesn't really care about eth0 and
> eth1. Once the RH 7.3 kernel was installed it configured eth0, which
> was not the interface the install ran on. Of course I assumed the
> labeled NIC 1 would correspond to eth0 in Linux world. Ha. A bit like
> Solaris changing the way they number SCSI devices between I think 2.5
> and 2.6.
:-)
> I am just hoping that the MAC addresses listed for the nodes which no
> longer match the interfaces used for the cluster doesn't come back to
> haunt me. May be another install to be safe!
The SIS guys would have to answer that, but given the number of times
you've reinstalled, one more certainly can't hurt. :-)
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Oscar-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
