Oh and to be a little bit more precise: I NEVER liked Zinc (I even flamed it multiple times). But in the end, it proved to be the most advanced wrapper around (at least for what I needed).
Cedric > Actually, I was able to launch VLC with Zinc (not Zinc specific, but > it does manage activex) and pass the HD streams to VLC > now, I am looking at a splitted screen with 4 HD streams, all totally > fluid. > Ok ok, I have a tough graphic card, but my tests so far indicate that > there is plenty of margin. > Moreover, with VLC I can load in almost any video type (even FLVs)... > though i am doing an internal check, and if video is FLV I stream it > with Flash... > The app I am building is quite technical, and clients' constraints > are very high (regarding HD (and full hd) Streaming). To be honest, > it isn't a desktop application, more like a 'computer app' > > Cedric > >> Not to be obtuse, but can you stream HD video with Zinc? >> >> Does streaming HD video establish the validity of a desktop app? >> >> Anyhow, you can stream video with Flash Media Server to the flash >> player (AIR). Probably Red5 too. Right? >> >> >> On Feb 8, 2008 2:02 AM, Cedric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> yes works well, but quite not a true desktop app: how would you >> stream Full HD video with AIR ? >> >> >>> yeah, and just to be the rah rah boy - AIR rocks. >>> >>> fine, shoot me, but it *works* well >>> >>> On Feb 7, 2008 7:33 PM, Arnoud Bos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Try screenweaver haxe (swhx) if you are not afraid of command line >>> tools. >>> >>> Works great! >>> >>> >>> And it's opensource (this is an open source list, right?) >>> >>> >>> Arnoud >>> >>> >>> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:osflash- >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens bean tickler >>> Verzonden: donderdag 7 februari 2008 23:25 >>> Aan: [email protected] >>> Onderwerp: [osflash] MDM Zinc v3 rant >>> >>> >>> Sad sad sad. >>> >>> >>> Too long have I and almost everyone I know suffered with this poor >>> product and its predecessors. 2.5 buggy buggy buggy. V3 beta, buggy >>> but fine, BETA. V3 RELEASE, same as BETA, not one bug fixed from >>> what I can tell and they have ditched tons of the functionality >>> they had in 2.5!!! >>> >>> >>> Why oh why do we bother??? Well, at one point they were the best of >>> a bad bunch with shed loads of commands and slick marketing. >>> However, I feel the competitors have overtaken them. Just look at >>> the likes of Janus (a new but reliable tool) and SWF studio. >>> >>> >>> For me I would have loved to have stayed with SWF Studio but they >>> had no handheld or Mac output. Janus is my new favorite as it has >>> yet to cause me an embarrassing client crash and has Mac and Linux >>> output coming up). But wow, I feel soo dumb for ever buying Zinc!! >>> >>> >>> Every negative post on their "community" forum gets deleted, they >>> are now even checking posts _before_ they go live. >>> >>> >>> Sorry for the rant. But guessing this post wont be deleted!!! >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> osflash mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> [ JPG ] >>> _______________________________________________ >>> osflash mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> osflash mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org >> >> >> >> -- >> : : ) Scott >> >> Helping your grandma on the interweb >> at: http://blog.criticalpile.com >> _______________________________________________ >> osflash mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
