I totally agree.  Without the ability to launch external apps AIR will have
a hard time becoming more than a novelty.

By the way, you can also use SQLLite with MDM.
http://www.thecodezone.com/downloads/sqlite.php


-------------------------------

Iman Khabazian

Managing Director, iMAN IT

949.231.8042

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.imanit.com

www.scuge.com

www.imanit.com/blog

On Feb 13, 2008 2:45 PM, Keith Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Even as a hack, it is not pure AIR. It requires installing and running
> another application on your machine. The Artemis project does something
> similar.  I totally agree with what Sam that this was a really poor
> decision. I think most of us would have gladly left the SQLLite stuff behind
> in favor of this.
>
>  Keith Peters
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  On Feb 13, 2008, at 5:38 PM, Iman Khabazian wrote:
>
>  has anyone tried the hack?
>
> http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2008/01/17/commandproxy-net-air-integration-proof-of-concept/
>
>
> -Iman
>  -------------------------------
> Iman Khabazian
> Managing Director, iMAN IT
> 949.231.8042
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.imanit.com
> www.scuge.com
> www.imanit.com/blog
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 2:31 PM, Samuel Agesilas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yea it is a major, fudge up by Adobe. Essentially with AIR Adobe build
> > the Ferrari of desktop app development, but decided to slash all the tires
> > and put sugar in the gas tank when they  decided to seriously hamper AIR by
> > not allowing calls apps to launch.  Talk about a dumb and stupid decision.
> > and I don't believe Adobe knows how crucial of a feature that is! For
> > example, I had a client come to us to develop a UI for an audio processing
> > software project. For the UI we looked at JavaFX ( which is not quite ready
> > ), Java, QT and Adobe AIR. AIR hit all of the points and the client was
> > ready to roll with AIR except for that crucial fact of not being able to
> > launch external apps. That was the deal breaker and the client walked away
> > from AIR development and decided to go with QT. It's a shame to because that
> > particular project was perfect for Flash + AIR. If anyone at Adobe is
> > reading this, PLEASE stop handicapping your products and start trusting your
> > developer community.
> > my two cents.
> > -sam
> >
> >  On Feb 8, 2008, at 6:18 AM, slangeberg wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, you're right. Not being able to make system calls / launch apps IS
> > a major shortcoming of AIR, at this point.
> >
> > Here's an official Adobe statement, as of June:
> >
> > *src*:
> > http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=641&threadid=1298770&STARTPAGE=2&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Linear
> >
> > Thank you everyone who has contributed to this thread. My name is Rob
> > Christensen and I'm a product manager on Adobe AIR. I'd like to provide some
> > clarity on this topic, but also invite you to share additional thoughts.
> >
> > The primary reason that AIR 1.0 does not include support for launching
> > native applications originates from a founding design decision/philosophy.
> > Applications that do not depend on other applications to be installed result
> > in a better user experience. Our goal with AIR has been to deliver a runtime
> > that delivers applications consistently across operating systems. Please
> > note that this doesn't mean we're right nor that we might not change our
> > minds on this.
> >
> > We'd like to hear what you think on this topic. It's helpful if you can
> > let us know what you're trying to build. The more specific you can be, the
> > more helpful it is to our team. Please reply to this thread or send us a
> > note through our feedback form. This form will send a message directly to
> > our development and product management team.
> >
> > Feedback for (Adobe AIR)
> > http://www.adobe.com/go/wish/
> >
> > As with any design decision, there's plenty of opportunity to debate the
> > topic and this is something we continue to discuss even internally. The
> > major disadvantage is that it's much more difficult to take advantage of
> > existing code libraries or launch other native applications.
> >
> > At the same time, one advantage to the current design is that when you
> > distribute an application, you do not need to say, "This is a really great
> > application, but make sure you have Microsoft Windows (or OSX) installed as
> > well as Microsoft Word (or Photoshop or some other native product) to really
> > take advantage of this application."
> >
> > Again, we may revisit this decision in the future and as with any 1.0,
> > you almost always come to reconsider your initial design goals. There are
> > some interesting options here such as the one discussed earlier of launching
> > the default application for a specific file type.
> >
> > Stuartc11: It is possible to launch a web browser by the way and some of
> > the sample applications have code that that demonstrate how to do this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Rob
> > Product Manager, Adobe AIR
> >
> >
> > -Scott
> >
> > PS: Zinc blows holes in the ozone.
> >
> >
> > On Feb 8, 2008 5:41 AM, Cedric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Actually, I was able to launch VLC with Zinc (not Zinc specific, but
> > > it does manage activex) and pass the HD streams to VLC
> > > now, I am looking at a splitted screen with 4 HD streams, all totally
> > > fluid.
> > > Ok ok, I have a tough graphic card, but my tests so far indicate that
> > > there is plenty of margin.
> > > Moreover, with VLC I can load in almost any video type (even FLVs)...
> > > though i am doing an internal check, and if video is FLV I stream it
> > > with Flash...
> > > The app I am building is quite technical, and clients' constraints
> > > are very high (regarding HD (and full hd) Streaming). To be honest,
> > > it isn't a desktop application, more like a 'computer app'
> > >
> > > Cedric
> > >
> > > > Not to be obtuse, but can you stream HD video with Zinc?
> > > >
> > > > Does streaming HD video establish the validity of a desktop app?
> > > >
> > > > Anyhow, you can stream video with Flash Media Server to the flash
> > > > player (AIR). Probably Red5 too. Right?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Feb 8, 2008 2:02 AM, Cedric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > yes works well, but quite not a true desktop app: how would you
> > > > stream Full HD video with AIR ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > yeah, and just to be the rah rah boy - AIR rocks.
> > > > >
> > > > > fine, shoot me, but it *works* well
> > > > >
> > > > > On Feb 7, 2008 7:33 PM, Arnoud Bos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Try screenweaver haxe  (swhx) if you are not afraid of command
> > > line
> > > > > tools.
> > > > >
> > > > > Works great!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > And it's opensource (this is an open source list, right?)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Arnoud
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:osflash-
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens bean tickler
> > > > > Verzonden: donderdag 7 februari 2008 23:25
> > > > > Aan: [email protected]
> > > > > Onderwerp: [osflash] MDM Zinc v3 rant
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sad sad sad.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Too long have I and almost everyone I know suffered with this poor
> > > > > product and its predecessors. 2.5 buggy buggy buggy. V3 beta,
> > > buggy
> > > > > but fine, BETA. V3 RELEASE, same as BETA, not one bug fixed from
> > > > > what I can tell and they have ditched tons of the functionality
> > > > > they had in 2.5!!!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Why oh why do we bother??? Well, at one point they were the best
> > > of
> > > > > a bad bunch with shed loads of commands and slick marketing.
> > > > > However, I feel the competitors have overtaken them. Just look at
> > > > > the likes of Janus (a new but reliable tool) and SWF studio.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > For me I would have loved to have stayed with SWF Studio but they
> > > > > had no handheld or Mac output. Janus is my new favorite as it has
> > > > > yet to cause me an embarrassing client crash and has Mac and Linux
> > > > > output coming up). But wow, I feel soo dumb for ever buying Zinc!!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Every negative post on their "community" forum gets deleted, they
> > > > > are now even checking posts _before_ they go live.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for the rant. But guessing this post wont be deleted!!!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > osflash mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > [  JPG  ]
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > osflash mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > osflash mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > : : ) Scott
> > > >
> > > > Helping your grandma on the interweb
> > > > at: http://blog.criticalpile.com
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > osflash mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > osflash mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > : : ) Scott
> >
> > Helping your grandma on the interweb
> > at: 
> > http://blog.criticalpile.com_______________________________________________
> > osflash mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osflash mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to