Robert,

OK, no problem, thanks. It's pixelated just because i zoomed in to the image to highlight the effect i was seeing.

Martins


Robert Osfield wrote:
Hi Matins,

Slight variations of the pixel colour may come about due to GDAL interpolating data, interpolation done with VPB, or the edge boundary equalization. The small variation you are seeing might simply be down to this, it's not something at this stage I'd even flag up as a problem. It certainly doesn't looked to be the corner equalization bug, as this just effects the corners.

BTW, the way is there a reason for the image being pixelated? VPB typically generates databases that use linear texture filtering.

Robert.

2009/3/19 Martins Innus <min...@ccr.buffalo.edu <mailto:min...@ccr.buffalo.edu>>

    Robert,
           Thanks. Using -e with appropriate options did exactly what I
    wanted, except for a slight error on the edges of the created
    images.  If i overlay the created image tiles from the highest
    resolution level on top of the original source imagery, they are
    pixel to pixel exact except for a 1 pixel strip all the way around
    the image.
           It appears that the edge values are an average of what the
    pixel value actually should be and the pixel directly adjacent to it
    but what should be the next tile.
           If you layer the attached good and bad images on top of each
    other in an image viewer and toggle back and forth you can see the
    pixels changing.
           The good image is just the original source imagery zoomed in.
     The bad image shows the vpb generated tile overlayed  on the left side.

           I saw the "corner equalization bug" posts, but this seems
    like a different issue.

    This is under Redhat Enterpise Linux, x86_64, with OSG 2.8 and VPB
    svn of a couple days ago.

    Martins


    Robert Osfield wrote:

        Hi Martins,

        You could try to use the -e option.  It takes lat/longs as
        input.  I don't know if it'll pad though, as I suspect it won't
unless the at least some of the input data covers the region. If you want to force the resolution to be the same then just use
        the image and height res option.  I can't recall what they off
        the top of my head, run osgdem --help to list them all.

        Robert.

        On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Martins Innus
        <min...@ccr.buffalo.edu <mailto:min...@ccr.buffalo.edu>
        <mailto:min...@ccr.buffalo.edu <mailto:min...@ccr.buffalo.edu>>>
        wrote:

           Hello,
                  I'm using VPB to generate a terrain database with 2ft
           resolution elevation data and 1 ft resolution imagery. What I'm
           trying to do is make the imagery in the highest resolution tiles
           have the exact same resolution as the source imagery and also
        still
           be a power of 2 for the image tiles.
                  I've verified that if I take a small input area where the
           source imagery dimensions are a power of 2, I get what i want for
           the final model.
                  It seems that if I could tell VPB to "pad out" the
        extents of
           my input data to a power of 2 that should work as well.  I don't
           care if its black or garbage or whatever.

                  Would the "-e" option do what I want if I specify extents
           larger than the input data?  I'm about to give that a try but it
           takes about three days for this job to run to completion, so I
           figured I would ask if anyone has tried to do the same thing.

           Thanks for any insight.

           Martins
           _______________________________________________
           osg-users mailing list
           osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
        <mailto:osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org>
           <mailto:osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
        <mailto:osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org>>

http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org



        ------------------------------------------------------------------------


        _______________________________________________
        osg-users mailing list
        osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
        <mailto:osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org>
        
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org


    _______________________________________________
    osg-users mailing list
    osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
    <mailto:osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org>
    http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org



------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to