We received OpenFlight data from our customer for the map that we need to 
display on our software. The data consists of terrain data, texture data, and 
model data. The database is 1000kmx1000km. My former co-worker wrote a tool 
that renders all of this OpenFlight data and generates bitmaps from it 
(12000x12000 pixels). We are using a resolution of 4 meters per pixel for the 
bottom half of the database (mostly water), and a resolution of 2 meters per 
pixel for the upper half of the database). After his tool is done we have 1879 
bitmaps and an args file that we pass into OSGDem to generate an .ive database 
which will be used by our database.
He wrote a method and added it to our OSGDem project that takes the args file 
as an -ARGS_FILE argument and feeds OSGDem all of the bitmaps and their 
corresponding arguments. When this is done, we have a master .ive file with a 
number of "subtile" .ive files for each Level of Detail. In the samples my 
co-worker generated, the highest level was L8, and we were currently going to 
L10 or L11 (the output screen says "Need to Divide X + Y for Level 10", so I'm 
assuming it's going to Level 11, and if L0 is one of those, then we've got 12 
Levels). Our software then uses all of these .ives and the appropriate level of 
detail is displayed based on the current Zoom Level in our software 
(user-specified dynamically).

 

 

 
> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:38:18 -0700
> From: xe...@alphapixel.com
> To: osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
> Subject: Re: [osg-users] Setting up VPBMaster
> 
> Jacob Armstrong wrote:
> > question, you're exactly right. I'm taking a bunch of Openflight data
> > with 3D terrain/textures/models and I'm just generating a 2D map to be
> > displayed from the Bird's-Eye-View. Your comment about going about that
> > the wrong way scares me, but also indicates that there's a better way?
> > Could you shed some light on that? I would love to pursue a different
> > approach if it's more feasible for what I'm doing.
> 
> Using 3D to solve a 2D problem is never the right approach.
> 
> Your mention of OpenFlight makes no sense to me. OSGDEM can't take OpenFlight 
> data as an
> input data source AFAIK. My understanding is you have a bunch of raster 
> images you're
> feeding to OSGDEM (possibly with some DEM terrain data, but maybe not) and 
> making a .OSG
> dataset.
> 
> Explain to me what role OpenFlight is playing here. I could write you a 2D 
> zoomable map
> window component that would mop the floor with what you're trying to do. 
> You're using a
> gigantic hammer (OSG, 3D, openGL, OSGDEM) to solve a 'screw' problem that 
> should really be
> solved with a screwdriver (2d graphics techniques).
> 
> -- 
> Chris 'Xenon' Hanson, omo sanza lettere Xenon AlphaPixel.com
> PixelSense Landsat processing now available! http://www.alphapixel.com/demos/
> "There is no Truth. There is only Perception. To Perceive is to Exist." - Xen
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141664/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to