> I differ on this one. I think that binaries are mostly used > by people new to osg who want to see what it does. When I > started to investigate which graphics library to use for my > application, it was really very good to have the examples > together with the library in a nice installer. > When I started to do real work with the osg I compiled it > myself anyway (as I used to use mingw, and there are no > binaries), and when you get used to it, it´s no big deal to > build it. But for people who use the binaries the examples > are important.
Do we really need to include lots of different examples in the binary distribution? You can show off a lot of OSG functionality with just osgviewer and a large collection of .osg files (cessnafire, etc). -Paul _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@openscenegraph.net http://openscenegraph.net/mailman/listinfo/osg-users http://www.openscenegraph.org/
