On 17/11/13 12:41, Tom Eugelink wrote:
On 2013-11-17 11:44, Neil Bartlett wrote:
Actually I hope that with JPM4J integration (see jpm4j.org
<http://jpm4j.org>) we will be able to do much better than Maven...
Owwww, jpm4j; "Windows (not yet)"... This is exactly why I tweeted
yesterday that OSGi feels immature (and later corrected that to
Bndtools, but now I'm not so certain). The core technology may be proven
and stable, but the whole environment seems to be very "developer doing
a project", or hacky. I know all nowadays widely used projects start
like that, but I knew OSGi is proven technology. I simply did expect to
learn what I'm finding on the interwebz.
we're trying to help you...
if there are things you don't like, then feel free to contribute, all of
it is open source and open spec...
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
--
Ferry Huberts
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
