As I tweeted to you, the core OSGi technology is very mature. What we're building is an entire ecosystem of tools, repositories, and extended runtimes on top of that core. This takes time.
I for one am glad to be involved at the beginning with a chance to shape the future, rather than having to accept all the decisions already made by others. As for Windows... I'm sorry but Windows will always be a second or even third class platform for developers. Neil -- Neil Bartlett Sent from a phone On Sunday, 17 November 2013 at 11:41, Tom Eugelink wrote: > On 2013-11-17 11:44, Neil Bartlett wrote: > > Actually I hope that with JPM4J integration (see jpm4j.org > > (http://jpm4j.org)) we will be able to do much better than Maven... > > > Owwww, jpm4j; "Windows (not yet)"... This is exactly why I tweeted yesterday > that OSGi feels immature (and later corrected that to Bndtools, but now I'm > not so certain). The core technology may be proven and stable, but the whole > environment seems to be very "developer doing a project", or hacky. I know > all nowadays widely used projects start like that, but I knew OSGi is proven > technology. I simply did expect to learn what I'm finding on the interwebz. > _______________________________________________ > OSGi Developer Mail List > [email protected] > https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OSGi Developer Mail List [email protected] https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
