On 2013-11-17 14:52, Ferry Huberts wrote:
On 17/11/13 12:41, Tom Eugelink wrote:
On 2013-11-17 11:44, Neil Bartlett wrote:
Actually I hope that with JPM4J integration (see jpm4j.org
<http://jpm4j.org>) we will be able to do much better than Maven...
Owwww, jpm4j; "Windows (not yet)"... This is exactly why I tweeted
yesterday that OSGi feels immature (and later corrected that to
Bndtools, but now I'm not so certain). The core technology may be proven
and stable, but the whole environment seems to be very "developer doing
a project", or hacky. I know all nowadays widely used projects start
like that, but I knew OSGi is proven technology. I simply did expect to
learn what I'm finding on the interwebz.
we're trying to help you...
if there are things you don't like, then feel free to contribute, all of it is
open source and open spec...
I understand fully, I do a lot of open source development myself. I'm only
expressing an unexpected situation I encountered when trying to pick up OSGi.
But you are right, I should not. And I'm trying to help, by offering
suggestions in my previous email.
_______________________________________________
OSGi Developer Mail List
[email protected]
https://mail.osgi.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-dev
