http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes
<http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=39983> &id=39983

 

Preparing For the Attack Part 1: Hardening the Target, You 

by  <http://www.humanevents.com/search.php?author_name=Ernest+Emerson>
Ernest Emerson
<http://www.humanevents.com/search.php?author_name=Ernest+Emerson>  (more by
this author)

Posted 11/16/2010 ET
Updated 11/17/2010 ET

 

http://www.humanevents.com/images/Emerson%20Article_ARTICLE%20PICTURE.JPGIn
one of the previous articles I talked about the OODA loop and also the Fight
or Flight survival trigger and its various components.  I also talked about
how it is necessary to go through those mechanisms as quickly as possible in
order to go from a reactive to an active response to the attacker, and that
it is a key factor in upping the odds in favor of your survival.

"You Never Want To Run Into Something For the First Time In Combat."
 - Emerson Combat System Mantra

I will assume that those of you who are reading this that have had firearms
instruction or combat training have heard of the effects that a spontaneous,
unexpected threat stimulus has on the body.  And I'm sure that we all were
taught and all agree that one of the effects is that our fine motor skills
go to heck in a hand basket in a high stress environment.  In addition to
tunnel vision, auditory exclusion, increased heart rate, the adrenaline and
cortisol hormone cocktail totally negate your ability to execute fine motor
skills in a gross motor skills environment.  It is often described as
wearing gloves or oven mitts.  We've all been taught that.  We all agree on
that, right?

Tell that to a Fight Pilot.  Here you have an individual flying at Mach II
in the cockpit of a $55 million dollar machine, 20,000 feet in the air,
directing flight control over a bank of controls and instruments, both heads
up displays and dash mounted, in charge of fire control, cognizant of the
rest of his squadron and in contact with them, tracking radar both for
position and possible enemy birds or radar lock on his position.  In
addition the pilot is following his mission directives and reporting status
back to command.  That is a pretty high stress environment if you ask me.
And it sounds like the pilot is using some pretty fine motor skills.

Yet, it is true that all of the effects of adrenaline and cortisol that I
mentioned previously are real and they do take place.  So how is this
possible?  How can a fighter pilot use all of these finite motor skills in a
high stress, gross motor skills environment?  Because he has done it before.
Do you recall that I asked the question in the article on The Attributes of
the Sociopathic Predator, "Why do bad guys win?"  The answer was, "because
they've done this before."  It's the same answer here concerning the fighter
pilot.  Actually it's the same principle.  Funny thing about Principle and
Concepts.  They are completely objective.  They don't take sides.  They
don't change.  They are universal and they apply equally as well for bad
guys as they do for good guys.  How do we make them work for us?

Reality Based Training

This is the game changer.  This is what separates the traditional rote
memorization of skills and techniques from the evolutionary, adaptive
ability to effectively apply learned skills and decision making processes in
the fluid, dynamic environment of actual combat.  You may ask, just what the
heck is he talking about?  We're going to take a brief historical look at
the evolution of Reality Based Training.  The goal of reality based training
is to identify and analyze the combat environment and to reproduce it as
closely as possible in training.

Enter Colonel John Boyd, aka 40 second Boyd, a nickname he earned as a
fighter pilot in combat training because of his ability to gain the superior
position on opponents in 40 seconds or less.  John Boyd was a fighter pilot
but was also one of the most influential and important Military analysts and
strategists of modern times, also known for the concept of the OODA Loop.
Boyd was in part responsible for the modernization of fighter pilot combat
training and architect of the Air Force Fighter Pilot Training program which
was also the model used to create the Air Force Red Flag Training and the US
Navy Top Gun fighter pilot training program.

How does this relate to our discussion?  I will ask another question.  When
do most fighter pilots get shot down?  On their very first mission.  Boyd
and others looked at the data from decades of armed combat and were made
aware of a very important statistic.  Statistically it is most likely that a
fighter pilot would be shot down on his first or initial combat engagements.
However, if they survived their first 10 or 12 missions their survivability
jumped dramatically.  In fact so dramatically that statistically those
pilots were almost never shot down in combat.  As a result of this discovery
many things were learned.  One of which was that the environment of air
combat did produce all of the damning effects of high stress, high threat
physiological and psychological responses that we discussed earlier.  This
was not good for a pilot engaged in aerial combat.  Oven mitts and tunnel
vision do not enhance your survival skills at 17,000 feet.

By looking at this phenomena (the spike of survivability after a dozen or so
sorties), much was learned about the human's ability to adapt and prevail in
spite of the effects of high stress in a combat environment.  The most
obvious is simply the benefit of "Combat Experience," the more you engage in
combat the better you are at it.  As this was analyzed it was deduced that
the more an individual faced these high stress environments, the more he was
able to maintain both physical and psychological self control in spite of
the effects of large amounts of adrenaline, and cortisol, the increased
heart rate and all the other stress responses and their resulting
influences.  And the more times he faced these environments the more he
manipulated the environment and the less the environment manipulated him.

So in terms of Fighter Pilots it was proposed that if you could get a pilot
through his first 12 Combat missions in training before engaging a real
enemy in real combat then perhaps the survival rate would increase.  And it
worked.  By creating as close a combat environment as possible in training
and putting the pilot through that stress again and again you are in essence
inoculating the individual to the stress of combat before he is actually
exposed to it.  Hence the term, stress inoculation that is now commonly used
to describe this process.

Again, the question is; How does this relate to personal or individual
combat?  Well, like I've said throughout the series of articles, principles
don't change, they don't care where and how they are applied and they don't
care if you are a good guy or a bad guy.

Combat is combat.  It doesn't matter if you are engaged in a dog fight with
an Iranian Mig or a bad guy who's slinging lead or fists in your direction.
You will experience all of the deleterious effects of a high threat, high
stress event.  A large part of your ability to prevail and survive will
depend on whether the event controls you or if you control the event.

In terms of hand-to-hand combat the "Top Gun" training principle applies
equally as well.  The more experience you have had in gun fights or street
fights the less you are "infected" by the stress of that action.

In terms of most people, they do not have the "privilege" or "misfortune" of
actual combat experience and just as with fighter pilots you must in some
way prepare yourself for it.

Reality based training is one of the best ways to gain at least an
approximation of that experience.  How do we accomplish that?

I have a good friend who changed the state of firearms and gunfighter
training forever.  His invention is called Simunition and it enabled the use
of real guns firing wax bullets in gunfight simulations.  It has become one
of the standard training evolutions for almost all operators, agencies and
departments around the world.  Using Simunition, you could put operators
into active force on force scenarios and run them through time and time
again to give them their version of Top Gun training.  And it works.  I've
run my share of sims training classes and I've seen the results.  I will
also add that I was one of the first Tactical Instructors to recognize the
viability of air soft training in the same regard and introduced it as a
legitimate alternative to sims training, much easier and cheaper to use.
I'll admit it's not quite as "real" but it also produces dramatic
experiential results.

In terms of hand-to-hand combat there is of course no substitute for
training.  The key is taking the standard forms of training from the mat or
ring to reality based training.  Once again the need is to analyze the
combat environment and reproduce it as closely as possible in training.  I
will go into the ways you can weave this training into your life even if you
never go to the gym or step into the ring in next week's installment, 

Part 2 of Hardening The Target; 
Becoming The Force To be Reckoned With

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to