>5) #ResourceFormats >Just an observation (I know many other specs doe this as well) I wonder why we say anything about atom+xml anymore, do you really expect it? It would seem like we >should instead have the media type for JSON or more JSON considerations. > >So I'd strike the atom+xml bullet and "Atom Syndication Format XML", unless you have some hint of a need.
No one in the workgroup has voiced interest or need for Atom support. And no implementer is using this currently. I've taken this out of the spec. We'll consider again when we have a scenario that calls for it. Thanks ! T Tuan Dang Tivoli OSLC governance, OSLC Reconciliation workgroup lead, Tivoli Common Data Model Internet: [email protected] phone: (919) 224-1242 T/L 687-1242
