+1 Agree with the changes. Thanks, Steve Speicher IBM Rational Software OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web -> http://open-services.net
"Oslc-Recon" <[email protected]> wrote on 02/26/2013 04:27:15 PM: > From: Tuan Dang/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > To: [email protected] > Date: 02/26/2013 04:28 PM > Subject: Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec > Sent by: "Oslc-Recon" <[email protected]> > > >1) Please remove/update the red warning text in the front to be like how > PerfMon and Auto used (not just removing red text). It is very clear from > previous version that this is >the first version, don't need to reiterate. > >Namely: > >"NOTE: This version of the specification has version 2.0 to indicate that > it is an OSLC Core 2.0 compliant specification. This specification is the > initial version of an OSLC >Reconciliation specification." > > done. > > >2) #Introduction > >The term "artifact" and other general terminology really don't help me know > what this spec is about. It would be helpful to include some specific > samples/examples of how it >might: computers, IT resources, etc > > I've an example using ComputerSystem in the intro paragraph > > >3) #Namespaces 1 > >Namespaces should be hyperlinked so one can click on it to see the actual > vocabulary document. > > now hyperlinked to the crtv vocab page > > > > Thanks ! T > > Tuan Dang > Tivoli OSLC governance, OSLC Reconciliation workgroup lead, Tivoli Common Data Model > Internet: [email protected] > phone: (919) 224-1242 T/L 687-1242_______________________________________________ > Oslc-Recon mailing list > [email protected] > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-recon_open-services.net
