What does it do to me when someone trusts me? Into what kind of a relationship am I entered into? Seems to me that I dimly but very overwhelmingly experience every now and then and especially in os-t situations the forces of selforganisation. Whether I trust them or not they do manifest themselves powerfully. So my tendency is to avoid "trusting" people or processes when I find it such a happy thing just to experience and know about selforganisation and the capacity in me and in others, I suppose, to remember (sometimes two martinis are a great assist, as we know). Marei might also be of some help here in translating "I trust the people" or "I trust the process" into percept language...sometimes that gives some more insight. Greetings from Berlin and see you all in Halifax mmp
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:02:24 -0500, Harrison Owen wrote: >Several evenings ago I was invited to participate in a group considering >"Strategic Planning in a Self-Organizing world." The topic really interested >me and I was hoping for a great discussion. As it turned out, we had a great >discussion, but the focus turned to Open Space which I suppose was >understandable given my history. The conversation moved to a consideration >of the role of the facilitator, and several people in the group made it >quite clear that the notion of standing in the middle of a circle of 300 >folks who may not like each other very much was very nervous making (at >least to them). Question: How do you do that? Answer: "Trust the Process." >And when that answer was given just about every one in the group nodded >their heads in agreement as if Truth had been spoken. > >"Trust the Process" is, and has been, the mantra of group work for as long >as I can remember, and when the words were spoken, my head started to nod >along with all the rest. But suddenly my head stopped - mid-nod, so to >speak. Something seemed quite wrong and I found myself thinking - NO - it is >really all about trusting the people! > >The people present were largely OD (Organization Development) practitioners >for whom the design of processes which enable groups of people to get useful >work done is their stock in trade. And running those processes with multiple >groups is how they make their living. I myself have been there and done >that. Trusting the process (especially when things got a little bit hairy) >is the standard mode of behavior and the accepted path to salvation when it >seemed that everything was falling apart. So what was my problem? > >It suddenly dawned on me that we had been placing the process above the >people, and in that act had assumed a god like position of omniscience. For >the best of reasons (usually) we tacitly assumed that our infinite wisdom >would enable those poor benighted souls to rise to the level of Inspired >performers. With this new process - whatever it was - salvation was >definitely close at hand, and we were present to usher in that beatific >state. What an ego trip! And of course - the way forward was, Trust the >Process. > >But . . . you might reasonably ask - Isn't Open Space simply another example >of the same sort of thing? Just another "process." I am sure that most >people who have heard about Open Space, and not a few who have actually used >it, might think so. These are the sorts of people who show up in every >training program I have conducted with the objective of "finding a new tool >for their toolbox." In most cases, before the program has concluded they >have either left early in frustration - or more likely have found their >minds twisted in some curious ways. If Open Space is a process, just like >any other process, it is definitely a very odd process. It was "designed" in >less than an hour on the strength of two martinis. For a successful >application, there are zero requirements for advance training for those who >will participate, no special steps to remember, no private language to >learn. The facilitator "does" next to nothing, and it always works provided >nobody (and most particularly the facilitator) attempts to "manage" the >process and/or take charge. > >Of course, on some level Open Space is a process - but it is a process that >is totally internal to the people involved. There is nothing to learn, they >are already there - although it may be true that there is much to un-learn. >The role of the facilitator then becomes one of trusting the people to be >fully what they already are. And more often than not that is what happens. >Trust the People. > >Some thoughts on a beautiful March morning here in little old Potomac. > >Harrison > > > > > >Harrison Owen >7808 River Falls Drive >Potomac, Maryland 20845 >Phone 301-365-2093 > >Open Space Training www.openspaceworld.com <http://www.openspaceworld.com/> > >Open Space Institute www.openspaceworld.org >Personal website http://mywebpages.comcast.net/hhowen/index.htm >osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu >To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives Visit: >http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html > > > > >* >* >========================================================== >osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu >------------------------------ >To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, >view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu: >http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html > >To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: >http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist > Michael M Pannwitz, boscop eg i.G. Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany ++49-30-772 8000 www.boscop.de www.michaelmpannwitz.de Check out the new Open Space World Map now with 191 Open Space Workers in 40 countries www.openspaceworldmap.org * * ========================================================== osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs: http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist