Interesting idea. And I’ve never known Grief (dying, birthing) to happen on a 
schedule. Seems to happen when it happens.

 

Harrison

 

Winter Address

7808 River Falls Drive

Potomac, MD 20854

301-365-2093

 

Summer Address

189 Beaucaire Ave.

Camden, ME 04843

207-763-3261

 

Websites

www.openspaceworld.com

www.ho-image.com

OSLIST To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of 
OSLIST Go 
to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 

From: OSList [mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org] On Behalf Of agusj 
via OSList
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 6:16 PM
To: Lourdes Adriana Diaz-Berrio Doring; World wide Open Space Technology email 
list
Subject: Re: [OSList] From "here to there"... "less is more"

 

Hello,

 

Continuing with my last post, I want to share some new reflections about the OS 
process. 

 

If we interpret the first day of a three-day OS event like the "death process" 
that organizations need in order to letting go the past, to open space for the 
emergent future possibilities, would it be better to dedicate less time to the 
"death process" in comparison with the time we devote for the "birth process"? 
I know that grief is important and needs time, but I think that it is more 
constructive to focus in the future that could emerge.

 

Assuming this, do you think that it would be a good idea reduce the first day 
to half day and shorten the time slots to 30 minutes, in order to accelerate 
the  "death process"? The first agenda would be established for this half day. 
With this, the group has almost the same number of conversations, although 
these are shorter. To close this first half day elegantly, you do it with a 
closing circle.  In this way, the group have one day and a half to the creative 
process and this phase would start  with an opening circle and a new agenda. 

 

Make sense?

 

Warm regards,

 

Agustin

 

 

 

  _____  

From: Lourdes Adriana Diaz-Berrio Doring <adri...@diazberrio.com>
To: agusj <agusjs2...@yahoo.com>; World wide Open Space Technology email list 
<oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> 
Cc: Suzanne Daigle <sdaig...@gmail.com> 
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [OSList] From "here to there"... "less is more"

 

Hi Agustin: I Like this book theory U I don,t think that I understand it very 
well but I am living mi self this process of letting go and letting come new 
things because I was in Montreal for seven years and now I live in Mexico again 
but in a new city called Queretaro. 
I will be facilitating an OS for the pschology students congress of the 
UCO_Mondragon university.

I am exited to do it.
 But yes every time explaining OS confronts me with this aspect that people 
need to let go to their old model before they accept to try this new one option.

I am also having the same difficulties with the other approach I use calle 
Groupe de codéveloppement profesionel based on experiential learning and group 
interaction. It is also based on the idea that a group has a collective 
intelligence that is bigger when we talk together.

I would like to share this method with people from this list. If someone wants 
to know more and to have a first experience I would like to offer a free on 
line session. I need minimum 3 people and maximum 5. It takes 2 hours. This 
method for me is very powerful and could be complementary with an OS event . 
Contact me if you want to know more!

 

Thank you for sharing this good ideas and experiences!

Adriana

 

2015-03-23 21:34 GMT-06:00 agusj via OSList <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>:

 

Hello Suzanne and all,

 

"The challenge is how to get from “here” to “there”.  Letting go the old ways 
of doing things, acknowledging the futility of much that we are now doing, 
starting to operate from a whole new frame, almost from scratch if one 
considers the contrast between hierarchy and self-organization.  This 
represents a ton of internal grief work and lots of trial and error." Wonderful 
 and provocative thought. 

 

I had the opportunity and the privelege of participating in the ULab led by 
Otto Sharmer some weeks ago. In my humble opinion, U Theory has 2 concepts that 
are in line with this conversation about death and birth. They are "letting go" 
and "letting come". You have to letting go the past in order to letting come 
the emergent future. I compare this "letting go" with the "death process" you 
are talking about, and the "letting come" with the "birth process" 
respectively.  I would dare say that these both "processes" are also present in 
OS. In the last year, I have facilitated 3 three-day OS events and what I have 
observed is that the first day is for "catharsis", and is only after that, that 
the group can overcome the past and is ready to letting come the emergent 
future in the second day.  I think that this "letting come" is possible, 
because OS propitiates the conditions for presencing, that happens at the 
bottom of the U, and this is the point where you connect to your inner source 
of inspiration and will.

 

I am eager to hear your ideas about this connection I have found between U 
Theory and OS.

 

Agustin

 

 

 

  _____  

From: Suzanne Daigle via OSList <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
To: OSLIST <OSList@lists.openspacetech.org> 
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 7:07 AM
Subject: [OSList] From "here to there"... "less is more"

 

Harrison and all,

 

I had the opportunity to visit some companies lately that had the stirrings of 
self-organization. One of them, Sun Hydraulics, was among the 12 organizations 
featured in Frederic Laloux’s book: Reinventing Organizations. And as luck 
would have it, Doug Kirkpatrick of Morning Star (another Laloux company) was 
touring with me. 

 

The other companies I visited were not at the same level but in their heart and 
actions, I knew they were heading in the same direction.  Though truly for all, 
it is the journey and not the destination that self-organization represents. 

 

I was in awe and truly could not get enough.  It reminded me of those best 
moments in my own work career when shared pride, purpose, collaboration, 
camaraderie, high performance and aliveness bubbled over. Above all, I was 
struck by the wonderful “ordinary” people doing “extraordinary things”; 
leadership lurking everywhere, individuals taking and living their own space 
with others.

 

In the joy of experiencing and reliving the intensity and vibrancy of what 
“work” can and should be like, I was struck and deeply saddened knowing how few 
organizations are operating this way.  How much pain and how much “settling and 
giving up” there still is in the world of work today.  

 

I see and feel the contrast of the two: lifeless versus vibrant.

 

And yet in the despair of knowing this, I sense a shift in consciousness, two 
realities colliding, as one world dies, another waits to be birthed.  There is 
much “hanging on” in companies today with a grasping of the “illusion of 
safety” that our old system operated on, whilst many are now edging towards 
something that is exerting its pull, something new. 

 

Much has been written about the industrial model under which most companies 
still operate.  A top-down hierarchy, command-control system with 
predictability and efficiency built in. The habits of this are embedded 
everywhere. Most of us know this operating system has been pushed to its limits 
and no longer serves. One can’t deny that much good came of it not the least of 
which we have been given more years in this wonderful life. Nor can one deny 
its excesses, which have caused much damage not the least of which to our human 
spirit on what matters most. 

 

The challenge is how to get from “here” to “there”.  Letting go the old ways of 
doing things, acknowledging the futility of much that we are now doing, 
starting to operate from a whole new frame, almost from scratch if one 
considers the contrast between hierarchy and self-organization.  This 
represents a ton of internal grief work and lots of trial and error. 

Does it require that our organizations hit bottom?  Or perhaps in our souls, we 
know that we have already hit bottom and this will be enough to propel us 
forward.  

 

Harrison says:  “The cure then would be to stop the wounding, at least until we 
could see how things might go. Of course, if the situation is really terminal, 
then by all means. Bring it on! That could be SCRUM, Facilitation, Last Rites, 
whatever…”

 

And then later he says:

“Before we do anything more, different, or otherwise – I sincerely believe we 
need to stop and appreciate what apparently happens very naturally, all by 
itself, with minimal or no assistance. And after that appreciative moment, we 
might think of a few things to do, but only a very few.”

 

Harrison, in my heart of hearts, I believe this too.  I believe in “less is 
more” even though I still struggle in living this way.  My struggles will be no 
different than the struggles of others and indeed there is beauty in those 
struggles, in doing it wrong, in losing and finding our way.  It is the essence 
and unfolding of life. 

 

And what I also know is what the “real deal” Open Space can do to snap us out 
of the command/control shackles, to shock us into awareness, a coming home to 
who we are buried there inside of us.  The work ahead, I believe, is to 
continue to invite from the place of where people are, without shame or blame, 
because they cannot know what they do not know until they have experienced it. 
That power of less is more. Knowing that in the "less" lies the best in high 
performance, creativity, human connection and life.  Therein lies the magic of 
Open Space.  It gives us a taste of what could be. 

 

Suzanne

 

Suzanne Daigle
Open Space Facilitator
NuFocus Strategic Group

FL 941-359-8877
Cell: 203-722-2009
www.nufocusgroup.com <http://www.nufocusgroup.com/> 
s.dai...@nufocusgroup.com
Twitter @Daiglesuz

 


_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org





Enviado desde mi iPad
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org




-- 


Dra. Adriana Díaz-Berrio  CRHA

438 338 1654 (Montreal, Canadá)

(52) 442 212 63 92 (Querétaro fijo)

(52) 55 13 28 19 12 (México DF)

www.diazberrio.com <http://www.diazberrio.com/> 

 

 

 

 

Continuing with my last post, I want to share some new reflections about the OS 
process. 

 

If we interpret the first day of a three-day OS event like the "death process" 
that organizations need in order to letting go the past, in order to open space 
for the emergent future possibilities, would it be better to dedicate less time 
to the "death process" in comparison with the time we devore for the "birth 
process"? I know that grief is important and needs time but I think that it is 
more constructive to focus in the future that could emerge.

 

Assuming this, do you think that it would be a good idea to accelerate the 
"death process" reducing the first day to half day shortening the time of the 
time slots to just 30 minutes as well? With this, the group has almost the same 

 

  _____  

From: Lourdes Adriana Diaz-Berrio Doring <adri...@diazberrio.com>
To: agusj <agusjs2...@yahoo.com>; World wide Open Space Technology email list 
<oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> 
Cc: Suzanne Daigle <sdaig...@gmail.com> 
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [OSList] From "here to there"... "less is more"

 

Hi Agustin: I Like this book theory U I don,t think that I understand it very 
well but I am living mi self this process of letting go and letting come new 
things because I was in Montreal for seven years and now I live in Mexico again 
but in a new city called Queretaro. 
I will be facilitating an OS for the pschology students congress of the 
UCO_Mondragon university.

I am exited to do it.
 But yes every time explaining OS confronts me with this aspect that people 
need to let go to their old model before they accept to try this new one option.

I am also having the same difficulties with the other approach I use calle 
Groupe de codéveloppement profesionel based on experiential learning and group 
interaction. It is also based on the idea that a group has a collective 
intelligence that is bigger when we talk together.

I would like to share this method with people from this list. If someone wants 
to know more and to have a first experience I would like to offer a free on 
line session. I need minimum 3 people and maximum 5. It takes 2 hours. This 
method for me is very powerful and could be complementary with an OS event . 
Contact me if you want to know more!

 

Thank you for sharing this good ideas and experiences!

Adriana

 

2015-03-23 21:34 GMT-06:00 agusj via OSList <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>:

 

Hello Suzanne and all,

 

"The challenge is how to get from “here” to “there”.  Letting go the old ways 
of doing things, acknowledging the futility of much that we are now doing, 
starting to operate from a whole new frame, almost from scratch if one 
considers the contrast between hierarchy and self-organization.  This 
represents a ton of internal grief work and lots of trial and error." Wonderful 
 and provocative thought. 

 

I had the opportunity and the privelege of participating in the ULab led by 
Otto Sharmer some weeks ago. In my humble opinion, U Theory has 2 concepts that 
are in line with this conversation about death and birth. They are "letting go" 
and "letting come". You have to letting go the past in order to letting come 
the emergent future. I compare this "letting go" with the "death process" you 
are talking about, and the "letting come" with the "birth process" 
respectively.  I would dare say that these both "processes" are also present in 
OS. In the last year, I have facilitated 3 three-day OS events and what I have 
observed is that the first day is for "catharsis", and is only after that, that 
the group can overcome the past and is ready to letting come the emergent 
future in the second day.  I think that this "letting come" is possible, 
because OS propitiates the conditions for presencing, that happens at the 
bottom of the U, and this is the point where you connect to your inner source 
of inspiration and will.

 

I am eager to hear your ideas about this connection I have found between U 
Theory and OS.

 

Agustin

 

 

 

  _____  

From: Suzanne Daigle via OSList <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
To: OSLIST <OSList@lists.openspacetech.org> 
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 7:07 AM
Subject: [OSList] From "here to there"... "less is more"

 

Harrison and all,

 

I had the opportunity to visit some companies lately that had the stirrings of 
self-organization. One of them, Sun Hydraulics, was among the 12 organizations 
featured in Frederic Laloux’s book: Reinventing Organizations. And as luck 
would have it, Doug Kirkpatrick of Morning Star (another Laloux company) was 
touring with me. 

 

The other companies I visited were not at the same level but in their heart and 
actions, I knew they were heading in the same direction.  Though truly for all, 
it is the journey and not the destination that self-organization represents. 

 

I was in awe and truly could not get enough.  It reminded me of those best 
moments in my own work career when shared pride, purpose, collaboration, 
camaraderie, high performance and aliveness bubbled over. Above all, I was 
struck by the wonderful “ordinary” people doing “extraordinary things”; 
leadership lurking everywhere, individuals taking and living their own space 
with others.

 

In the joy of experiencing and reliving the intensity and vibrancy of what 
“work” can and should be like, I was struck and deeply saddened knowing how few 
organizations are operating this way.  How much pain and how much “settling and 
giving up” there still is in the world of work today.  

 

I see and feel the contrast of the two: lifeless versus vibrant.

 

And yet in the despair of knowing this, I sense a shift in consciousness, two 
realities colliding, as one world dies, another waits to be birthed.  There is 
much “hanging on” in companies today with a grasping of the “illusion of 
safety” that our old system operated on, whilst many are now edging towards 
something that is exerting its pull, something new. 

 

Much has been written about the industrial model under which most companies 
still operate.  A top-down hierarchy, command-control system with 
predictability and efficiency built in. The habits of this are embedded 
everywhere. Most of us know this operating system has been pushed to its limits 
and no longer serves. One can’t deny that much good came of it not the least of 
which we have been given more years in this wonderful life. Nor can one deny 
its excesses, which have caused much damage not the least of which to our human 
spirit on what matters most. 

 

The challenge is how to get from “here” to “there”.  Letting go the old ways of 
doing things, acknowledging the futility of much that we are now doing, 
starting to operate from a whole new frame, almost from scratch if one 
considers the contrast between hierarchy and self-organization.  This 
represents a ton of internal grief work and lots of trial and error. 

Does it require that our organizations hit bottom?  Or perhaps in our souls, we 
know that we have already hit bottom and this will be enough to propel us 
forward.  

 

Harrison says:  “The cure then would be to stop the wounding, at least until we 
could see how things might go. Of course, if the situation is really terminal, 
then by all means. Bring it on! That could be SCRUM, Facilitation, Last Rites, 
whatever…”

 

And then later he says:

“Before we do anything more, different, or otherwise – I sincerely believe we 
need to stop and appreciate what apparently happens very naturally, all by 
itself, with minimal or no assistance. And after that appreciative moment, we 
might think of a few things to do, but only a very few.”

 

Harrison, in my heart of hearts, I believe this too.  I believe in “less is 
more” even though I still struggle in living this way.  My struggles will be no 
different than the struggles of others and indeed there is beauty in those 
struggles, in doing it wrong, in losing and finding our way.  It is the essence 
and unfolding of life. 

 

And what I also know is what the “real deal” Open Space can do to snap us out 
of the command/control shackles, to shock us into awareness, a coming home to 
who we are buried there inside of us.  The work ahead, I believe, is to 
continue to invite from the place of where people are, without shame or blame, 
because they cannot know what they do not know until they have experienced it. 
That power of less is more. Knowing that in the "less" lies the best in high 
performance, creativity, human connection and life.  Therein lies the magic of 
Open Space.  It gives us a taste of what could be. 

 

Suzanne

 

Suzanne Daigle
Open Space Facilitator
NuFocus Strategic Group

FL 941-359-8877
Cell: 203-722-2009
www.nufocusgroup.com <http://www.nufocusgroup.com/> 
s.dai...@nufocusgroup.com
Twitter @Daiglesuz

 


_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org





Enviado desde mi iPad
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org




-- 


Dra. Adriana Díaz-Berrio  CRHA

438 338 1654 (Montreal, Canadá)

(52) 442 212 63 92 (Querétaro fijo)

(52) 55 13 28 19 12 (México DF)

www.diazberrio.com <http://www.diazberrio.com/> 

 

 

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
Past archives can be viewed here: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org

Reply via email to