Whenever I want to know if my work of Hosting an Open Space Technology meeting was useful, I give the participants a form that sinplay says “complete the following sentence. As a result of this meeting...”
The only people who should be judging the efficacy of an OST meeting are the people who called it in the first place to get their work done. In my experience, they are happy if the meeting has helped them. My work is always directed towards client needs. Some times we do Open Space. Sometimes we do it in a way that would drive a “by the book” person crazy. But it’s about the clients. I doubt there is a way my process could be formalized in a way that works better for my clients than sitting down and listening to their needs. There is already a network of Open Space Institutes who steward this practice. There is an international association of facilitators who can join if you want certification. I find myself constantly wanting to defend this radical openness. Mark, what is behind your string desire for something more formal than what we already have? Chris. _____________ CHRIS CORRIGAN www.chriscorrigan.com > On Aug 19, 2019, at 8:29 AM, Mark Carmel via OSList > <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote: > > 1st of all thank you for everyone who gave me feedback on my big idea for > certification. It was sincerely appreciated. However I can see it was > something that did not Resonate well. > > Open space technology has clearly set the standard for the facilitation of > peace and human understanding. It is such a powerful and simple tool but > highly complex. As Harrison says.. chaos plows the fields of the mind so > that new ideas can grow... I think there is ample chaos for us to tackle > right now. > > I think it is highly important for the leadership of our open space world to > make a decision now while we still have Harrison among us as a living spirit. > Because we have already set the standards why not cement the standards and > turn it into an everlasting association that could be organized to deliver > training, etc. To advance the mission of human peace and understanding in a > more organized way? > > If you want to be a beautician or a mechanic or a rocket scientist or a city > manager there are associations for that . > > Why not an association for open space technology practitioners to define the > standards, the ethics, code of conduct, the way that Harrison has already > articulated them, but to formalize them and help us get organized and stay > organized until we get the job done? > > Respectfully submitted, > Mark Carmel > > > _______________________________________________ > OSList mailing list > To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org > To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org > To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: > http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org > Past archives can be viewed here: > http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org Past archives can be viewed here: http://www.mail-archive.com/oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
