Yes, but I think this issue need to be repaired in the app source code, so that any user could use this function without problems.
Em terça-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2016 14:23:49 UTC-2, stf escreveu: > > I created my own version of routing.xml and noticed that "avoid" often, > but not apparently always, was used where "prohibit" would have been > better. In my opinion, "avoid" should penalize the undesired roads but > still use them it that is the only way to make the routing work. A new > option "prohibit" should be used where, for example, it is illegal for you > to use the road (e.g. in some jurisdictions a motorized bicycle/scooter on > a motorway). > > FWIW, I think the routing.xml file is flexible enough that routing can be > done as you suggest without changes elsewhere in OsmAnd. > > On Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 6:05:42 AM UTC-8, Santamariense > Openstreetmapper wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> What is the meaning of "Avoid" to native english speakers? Avoid is >> translated to portuguese like "evitar". And "evitar" means don't make this >> unless this is the unique option. >> >> I don't like the osmand's avoid option because it does not calculate >> routes to places where the roads are unpaved. If I selected the avoid >> option, I want take there, using preferencially the paved roads, but if it >> is not possible I want to go by the unpaved ones because I want to get >> there. >> >> For me this is a BUG that need to be corrected in OSMAnd. In some places, >> the osmand app leave you lot of kilometres far the destination. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
