Correct. That's why we only penalize _turns_ onto such ways. Think: high penalty for entering a gated community.
Read more about it here: - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/happygo/diary/40564 (en) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/happygo/diary/40565 (de) Cheers, Daniel J H On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Florian Lohoff <f...@zz.de> wrote: > > Hi Patrick, > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:08:42PM +0000, Patrick Niklaus wrote: > > Hey, > > > > The 5.6.0 release features some great new features. Most importantly > > we now support the infamous issue > > [#77](https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/77): Routing > > on generic weights, not only the duration. This increased our resource > > usage quite a bit, so if you are running global deployments make sure > > you have enough headroom before upgrading. The car profile makes use > > of this new feature by penalizing turns onto restricted streets > > (hov-only, `access=destination`) heavily. This makes sure we don't > > route through them but still support starting/stopping from them. We > > access=destination is IMHO a bad example for this. Penalizing those > edges heavily will cause OSRM to very hard try to use the next > possibility to leave the access=destination segments or to enter > them at the very last possibility. The cost for using > access=destination roads is not proportional to the amount of distance > you travel on that road, but its a one time cost entering the > road/segment/area. > > In the end most of the time access=destination based roads build a > subgraph e.g. multiple interconnected roads and the area itself > is access=destination. > > Flo > -- > Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de > UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away > > _______________________________________________ > OSRM-talk mailing list > OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk > >
_______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
