On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 21:55, Kevin Callahan<[email protected]> wrote: > > just means we need more of an investigation
There needs to be some amount of evidence to warrant an investigation first. Everything about the towers' collapse has been explained by conventional, non-conspiracy means. Just because someone comes up with a crank idea that might be supported by poorly researched data doesn't mean that that avenue warrants further investigation. -- arno s hautala /-\ [email protected] pgp eabb6fe6 d47c500f b2458f5d a7cc7abb f81c4e00 _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
