On Jun 9, 2009, at 7:21 PM, Arno Hautala wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 22:10, Kevin Callahan<[email protected]> wrote:
On Jun 9, 2009, at 7:07 PM, Arno Hautala wrote:
Everything about the towers' collapse has been explained by
conventional, non-conspiracy means
apparently not to everyone's satisfaction ...
There are plenty of people who will never be convinced one way or
another.
of course
At a certain point, it's just not worth trying to educate
every last "armchair expert" about the best available evidence.
*available* is key
and I recall it was just a few bad apples at Abu Grahib .. - that's
how AG was explained
now we discover it was policy from the top down - approved by the
executive branch, by the oval office
(many a "conspiracy theorist" thought there was more to the story -
and these crackpots turned out to be the realists) -
and those who bought the "official story" bought a story of falsehoods
--
hey ! all the evidence proved it was just a few prison guards at AG,
right?
we saw a few pictures of a few guards doing bad things ..
just NO WAY could this have been policy
well, some folks just didn't believe the official story based on a
variety reasons and chose to dig deeper - possibly to prove a
hypothesis , a hunch ..
perhaps based on intuition, or other life experiences, or perhaps
there are those who know something about architecture, materials
science, physics
(I can't believe I'm explaining "inquisition" in this way LOL!) who
felt the official story didn't add up
obviously, given the nature of the collapses, particularly of a 47
story steel building falling at essentially free-fall speed that was
not hit by a plane ..
and considering the evidence was whisked away. coupled with shoddy
investigations by NIST and others -
it's only *reasonable *that countless people are not convinced by the
official story .. and are asking questions --
simply asking questions
if you buy the official story, so be it
and maybe you know everything --
but my guess is that you don't
K
_______________________________________________
OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected]
http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters
List hosted at http://cat5.org/
