On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 23:24, Kevin Callahan<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jun 9, 2009, at 8:11 PM, Arno Hautala wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 22:44, Kevin Callahan<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> now we discover [Abu Grahib] was policy from the top down - approved >>> by the executive branch, by the oval office >> >> Yeah, you'd think if the government WAS behind 911 > > are you making assumptions?
Yes. > I don't think the US govt. was behind 911 > > I never said that > and I don't think Bush nor Cheney orchestrated it > > where's the evidence to suggest I thought this ? Every thread of "just asking questions" regarding 911 I've seen has eventually lead to "the gubbermint did it". In addition, you brought up a comparison to Abu Grahib, which does have evidence of government cover. That said, I began to assume a conspiracy link when you wrote, "apparently not to everyone's satisfaction ...". Sorry for the assumption. > On Jun 9, 2009, at 8:11 PM, Arno Hautala wrote: > >> Every "truther" question I've ever heard has been answered logically > > okay ! > no more questions! > LOL! ? Let's approach this again. Are you "asking questions"? What are they specifically? If you don't accept the "official story", what is it you don't like? Is it anything more than "the official story doesn't add up" or "intuition"? Do you have alternative explanations for any of that? Suggestions for further research? The original topic of the "nano-thermite" is basically a poor study. Is this part of a bigger line of research you've been following? -- arno s hautala /-\ [email protected] pgp eabb6fe6 d47c500f b2458f5d a7cc7abb f81c4e00 _______________________________________________ OSX-Nutters mailing list | [email protected] http://lists.tit-wank.com/mailman/listinfo/osx-nutters List hosted at http://cat5.org/
