Hello Mary Alice:

Let  me  be  the  1st to say "Thanks" for writing. I understand what you
mean about taking time to write and then not getting any responses. But,
such is the nature of listserves!<smile>.

I  think  you've  touched on at least ONE area that can frustrate the OT
process.  IF an OT is focused on improving occupation but the patient is
focused  on improving strength/ROM there is inconsistency. Notice that I
say  FOCUS  because  as  you  correctly identified, improving occupation
usually  results  in  improving  the underlying impairments. But in this
case, the patient stated he was doing all he could.

OT is a "bizzaro" world! <smile>

Ron

----- Original Message -----
From: Mary Alice Cafiero <m...@mac.com>
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009
To:   OTlist@OTnow.com <OTlist@OTnow.com>
Subj: [OTlist] The Timing of OT...

MAC> I think that patients often equate PT not only with walking, but also  
MAC> with strengthening. It seems they often feel that the majority of  
MAC> their problems doing things are because of weakness. If they can just  
MAC> get stronger, all else will fix itself. I can see this especially  
MAC> being true with a diagnosis like MS or other progressive neuromuscular  
MAC> disease.

MAC> We, as OTs, can clearly see that learning to do the things you need to  
MAC> do for yourself has inherent value. It also ends up addressing  
MAC> strengthening without doing a straight exercise program. I tend to  
MAC> think that patients often prescribe to the "no pain, no gain" theory  
MAC> and feel that they have to do multiple reps of an exercise in order to  
MAC> address weak muscles.

MAC> My two cents. I'll be curious to see if anyone responds. The majority  
MAC> of times that I post a response on this board, no one directly  
MAC> responds, and my answers just get shuffled over. Not sure of the  
MAC> reason for that, but it is certainly frustrating. Makes me reluctant  
MAC> to post because it doesn't seem to add to or lead to further discussion.

MAC> Mary Alice

MAC> Mary Alice Cafiero, MSOT/L, ATP
MAC> m...@mac.com
MAC> 972-757-3733
MAC> Fax 888-708-8683

MAC> This message, including any attachments, may include confidential,  
MAC> privileged and/or inside information. Any distribution or use of this  
MAC> communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is  
MAC> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the recipient  
MAC> of this message, please notify the sender and permanently delete the  
MAC> message from your system.





MAC> On Feb 21, 2009, at 1:21 AM, Ron Carson wrote:

>> I had an interesting experience that I want to share.
>>
>> Last week, I evaluated a middle-aged man with muscular dystrophy. He  
>> had
>> recently moved back home with his parent and was started on home  
>> health.
>>
>> The  man  essentially told me that there was nothing I could do for  
>> him.
>> He said that PT was all he needed. I explained that as an OT, my job  
>> was
>> to  teach  him  to take care of himself as much as possible and  
>> desired.
>> But, he still felt that PT is what he needed.
>>
>> I  am really perplexed as to why someone might value PT instead of  
>> OT? I
>> have  some  ideas,  which  I'll share, but I hope readers are  
>> willing to
>> discuss this situation.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> --
>> Ron Carson MHS, OT
>> www.OTnow.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Options?
>> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com
>>
>> Archive?
>> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

MAC> --
MAC> Options?
MAC> www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

MAC> Archive?
MAC> www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com


--
Options?
www.otnow.com/mailman/options/otlist_otnow.com

Archive?
www.mail-archive.com/otlist@otnow.com

Reply via email to