On 29 March 2017 at 04:50, Roi Dayan <r...@mellanox.com> wrote: > > > On 23/03/2017 09:01, Joe Stringer wrote: >> >> I ran the make check-offloads tests on a recent net-next kernel and it >> failed, output was not as expected: >> >> ../../tests/system-offloaded-traffic.at:54 >> <http://system-offloaded-traffic.at:54>: ovs-appctl dpctl/dump-flows | >> grep "eth_type(0x0800)" | sed -e >> >> 's/used:[0-9].[0-9]*s/used:0.001s/;s/eth(src=[a-z0-9:]*,dst=[a-z0-9:]*)/eth(mac >> s)/;s/actions:[0-9,]*/actions:output/;s/recirc_id(0),//' | sort >> --- - 2017-03-22 16:43:37.598689692 -0700 >> +++ >> >> /home/vagrant/ovs/_build-clang/tests/system-offloads-testsuite.dir/at-groups/2/stdout >> 2017-03-22 16:43:37.595628000 -0700 >> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ >> -in_port(2),eth(macs),eth_type(0x0800), packets:9, bytes:756, >> used:0.001s, actions:output >> -in_port(3),eth(macs),eth_type(0x0800), packets:9, bytes:756, >> used:0.001s, actions:output >> +in_port(2),eth(macs),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(frag=no), packets:9, >> bytes:882, used:0.001s, actions:output >> +in_port(3),eth(macs),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(frag=no), packets:9, >> bytes:882, used:0.001s, actions:output >> > > Hi Joe, > > can you tell me what kernel you used here? > maybe tc offloads were not supported and there was a fallback to OVS dp.
I believe that it was a snapshot of net-next relatively recently, 01461abe62df ("Merge branch 'fib-notifications-cleanup'"). I could try again with latest net-next? Or do you think there may be some userspace dependency the test relies on? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev