Replies inline.

On 12/6/06, Paul Alfille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Curiouser and curiouser.
>
>  So your tests are
>  A -- single loop against DS18S20 sensor A
>  A+A -- two processes against sensor A
> AB -- single loop against sensors A and B
>  AB+AB -- two processes each AB style
>
>  Only AB+AB fails?

Yes.

>
>  And the failure is after a number of readings?
>

Yes. The number of readings does not seem to be predictable.

>  Are A and B different? One parasytic and the other powered?
>  If so, is "B" and "B+B" also ok? And "A+B"?
>

Yes.

>  I also assume that Vdd on the parasytic is properly grounded. And these are
> "uncached" readings.

I believe vdd is properly grounded. I'm not doing anything to trigger
uncached readings. The readings are definitely cached sometimes. The
85 get cached too.

>
>  This is sorta fun -- a little logic game. Credit to the person who first
> figures it out!

Aren't edge cases fun?

>
> Paul Alfille
>
>

Cheers,
Darryl

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to