Sorry -- I am using OWLIM 4.2 and Sesame 2.5.1 (and 2.5.0) on Ubuntu with Tomcat 7.0.8.
johann On 2011-10-13 17:21, Barry Bishop wrote: > Hi Johann, > > What version of OWLIM and Sesame are you using? > > I just tried this and it is working correctly in the workbench with the > latest Sesame 2.5.2 snapshot build. If it is not working for you with > OWLIM 4.2 and Sesame 2.5.0 then it is likely a recent fix. > > Best, > barry > > On 13/10/11 16:39, Johann Petrak wrote: >> This seems to be an issue with the OpenRDF Workbench: when >> using the API, this works correctly, but the checkbox in the >> workbench does not seem to have any effect. >> >> On 2011-10-13 15:59, Johann Petrak wrote: >>> Is the 'Include inferred statements' option supposed to work >>> for OWLIM (ruleset owl-max) and if yes, how? >>> >>> For example when >>> :inst1 a :MySubClass >>> is asserted and SubClass is a subclass of :MyClass, >>> the query >>> ?i a :MyClass >>> will always return :inst1, no matter if that option is checked. >>> But should not :inst a :MyClass be an inferred triple that >>> should only be returned when the 'include inferred' option is >>> set? >>> >>> What am I missing here? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> johann >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OWLIM-discussion mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> OWLIM-discussion mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion > _______________________________________________ OWLIM-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
