On 2011-10-13 20:32, Barry Bishop wrote: > Hi Johann, > > Ok, so it looks like a recent fix in Sesame (I could go reading through > the change log, but it wouldn't really help so much). > > OWLIM 4.3 will include this fixed version of the sesame workbench in the > release at the end of the month. > > I hope you can wait until then. > Thank you, good to know that it will be fixed in the next release -- as this only affects the Workbench GUI and works through the API it is, apart from the surprising results in the workbench, not such a big deal :)
Cheers, johann > On 13/10/11 18:34, Johann Petrak wrote: >> Sorry -- I am using OWLIM 4.2 and Sesame 2.5.1 (and 2.5.0) on >> Ubuntu with Tomcat 7.0.8. >> >> johann >> >> On 2011-10-13 17:21, Barry Bishop wrote: >>> Hi Johann, >>> >>> What version of OWLIM and Sesame are you using? >>> >>> I just tried this and it is working correctly in the workbench with the >>> latest Sesame 2.5.2 snapshot build. If it is not working for you with >>> OWLIM 4.2 and Sesame 2.5.0 then it is likely a recent fix. >>> >>> Best, >>> barry >>> >>> On 13/10/11 16:39, Johann Petrak wrote: >>>> This seems to be an issue with the OpenRDF Workbench: when >>>> using the API, this works correctly, but the checkbox in the >>>> workbench does not seem to have any effect. >>>> >>>> On 2011-10-13 15:59, Johann Petrak wrote: >>>>> Is the 'Include inferred statements' option supposed to work >>>>> for OWLIM (ruleset owl-max) and if yes, how? >>>>> >>>>> For example when >>>>> :inst1 a :MySubClass >>>>> is asserted and SubClass is a subclass of :MyClass, >>>>> the query >>>>> ?i a :MyClass >>>>> will always return :inst1, no matter if that option is checked. >>>>> But should not :inst a :MyClass be an inferred triple that >>>>> should only be returned when the 'include inferred' option is >>>>> set? >>>>> >>>>> What am I missing here? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> johann >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> OWLIM-discussion mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OWLIM-discussion mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion > _______________________________________________ OWLIM-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
