All I've found with asp.net mvc after using it for a few months is that I can't meet my deadlines.... but maybe I'm just an idiot. :)
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Richard Carde <rich...@carde.id.au> wrote: > It's Friday... > On 16 Mar 2010, at 22:24, Jonathan Parker <jonathanparkerem...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Keep a lookout for Umbraco 5 as well as this is going to be written in > ASP.NET MVC. > > I see this a fair bit and wonder... "If ASP.NET MVC came out first, would > people now be saying 'going to be [re-]written in ASP.NET Web Forms'"? > *shudder* > It's new... it must be better? > I understand the benefits of MVC (or, more realistically, not using the > abuse of HTML & HTTP that is WebForms) as I have a classic ASP background > and good understanding of the protocols used on the Interwebs, but it just > seems like people jump on the latest and greatest without understanding what > that brings (good and bad). More XSS, etc. perhaps? Dunno. > I know MVC has some helpers to properly encode output and that's great > providing you know how/when/why one uses them. Same goes for outputting into > strings used by JavaScript - watchout for the apostrophes and backslashes > etc. > <sarcasm>Thank goodness ASP.NET traps 'dodgy' characters like < and > in > user supplied data</sarcasm> > > -- > Richard Carde
