Bcoz webforms came to .net first and we all got productive with it. ;-) Also webforms is more mature and lots of controls are available. I have found that maintenance is faster with mvc though... very easy to find bugs and unit test.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Craig van Nieuwkerk <crai...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why not? > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:02 AM, DotNet Dude <adotnetd...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hand coding html isn't necessarily a waste of time but I can't see mvc >> development being as fast as webforms >> >> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Craig van Nieuwkerk <crai...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I don't think your an idiot ;-) But if you are someone who finds they >>> can write HTML/CSS/Js much faster by hand than using the ASP.NET >>> visual designers it shouldn't slow you down. But for people who think >>> hand coding HTML is the biggest waste of time, you could be in >>> trouble. >>> >>> Craig. >>> >>>> All I've found with asp.net mvc after using it for a few months is >>>> that I can't meet my deadlines.... but maybe I'm just an idiot. :) >>>> >>> >> >
