http://www.zdnet.com.au/google-launches-nexus-7-tablet-aussies-first-in-339340477.htm

As previously reported, the device was built by Asus, and comes with a
7-inch 1280x800 HD display. According to Google, it's running the Tegra 3
processor and has a front-facing camera for video chatting. Wi-Fi
connectivity, as well as Bluetooth and near-field communication (NFC)
support are also included in the device.


Hmmm, Microsoft, can you say "bridesmaid" ? :)


On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Bill McCarthy <
bill.mccarthy.li...@live.com.au> wrote:

> Ian & Chris,
>
> I hadn't responded to the second part of Chris's post yet as I wanted to
> first establish that the ACCC warning telcos to provide warranty the same
> as
> the devices contracts is not "bullhonky", but is a fact. The only one that
> doesn't still is Telstra with iPhone, at least judging from this article.
> But as they note they'd be had pressed if it was legally challenged:
>
> http://www.theage.com.au/digital-life/iphone/the-wisdom-of-warranty-20120328
> -1vx3y.html
>
> Regarding the updates, the Windows Phone update process is complex across
> all regions/telcos. This applies equally to the 7.8 update that's being
> rolled out.  Also note Nokia is also provided a firmware update as well.
> The new devices do not need to have secure boot, just like laptops &
> tablets
> do not require secure boot to run windows 8.  The issue about losing all
> your apps and data is a real one, the same issue that applies when you have
> to reset your device.
>
> I wouldn't expect updates to be provided to all phones, but the most
> current
> ones, especially the ones that Microsoft and the handset makers have been
> promoting heavily. Eg HTC Titan, Lumias etc.  If they find it too costly
> then perhaps they should offer a pro-rata discount off updating when they
> release their WP8 phone.  Because Microsoft built a complex ecosystem with
> multiple device manufactures and multiple telcos, doesn't mean the consumer
> should have to pay every time MS feels they need to adjust direction.
>
>
>
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
> |boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Ian Thomas
> |Sent: Thursday, 28 June 2012 11:44 AM
> |To: 'ozDotNet'
> |Subject: RE: Windows Phone 8 announced
> |
> |Chris
> |
> |That is the most informative response I have seen - I (for one) appreciate
> it. You
> |have described what I suspected were the technical problems behind the
> |decisions on WP8's new start in the smartphone business.
> |
> |Bill McCarthy obviously (imo) has some valid arguments about the evolution
> of
> |WP since mid-2011 Mango timeframe, and compares Apple's / Google's upgrade
> |planning. What happens will happen. I'd like to WP8 succeed.
> |
> |A few weeks ago I inferred that I thought the Lumia 900 was an advance on
> the
> |800, but still underpowered and had less than optimum screen resolution
> (or, at
> |least I think I did; I haven't looked for the evidence). Bill McC who owns
> a Lumia
> |800 mildly chastised me, rightly pointing out that it was better than the
> desktop
> |screens (RGB, etc) that we had a few years back. But I hate these small
> screens
> |with inadequate resolution for my eyesight.
> |
> |And the trivial "apps" - lumping phone + tablet together here. If I want
> info from
> |IMDB on a movie or its participants, I don't want a summary of this week's
> box
> |office successes, and other superficial fast food approaches to data or
> opinion.
> |Admittedly I've seen less than a hundred iPad apps, but enough for me to
> be
> |unimpressed by the median quality of the other 250K that are available.
> |
> |Actually - and hindsight is a great convenience if not a wonderful thing -
> I've had
> |the lingering discomfort that all of the WP hardware used by the
> manufacturers
> |of Windows Phones has been lagging or lacking. But that depends on what
> you
> |want in a smartphone, of course.
> |
> |I don't really know what I want in one - I use my non-smart mobile phone
> for
> |voice and SMS only (and not for data), and really dislike my Sony Ericsson
> W508a
> |(freed from Telstra but with its highly-modified menus and links to
> useless
> stuff.
> |And it PC to phone software is the worst I have encountered.
> |
> |But when a decent Windows Phone catches my imagination, I might buy and
> use
> |it. Maybe I want a tablet/slate instead? I'm attracted to the Windows
> Surface as
> |a tablet<--> PC, add Skype, and maybe I would dump my mobile account
> entirely.
> |
> |________________________________
> |Ian Thomas
> |Victoria Park, Western Australia
> |
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
> |boun...@ozdotnet.com]
> |On Behalf Of Chris Walsh
> |Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:22 AM
> |To: ozDotNet
> |Subject: RE: Windows Phone 8 announced
> |
> |Bill,
> |
> |"I'm pretty sure the ACCC told telcos they had to warranty devices for the
> length
> |of the contracts"
> |
> |Complete bullhonky there mate.  Telco's can have whatever length of
> contract
> |they like, the Hardware warranty isn't anything they can control.  You can
> pay
> |extra to the telco and NOT get a 24month play, you get the luck of the
> draw
> |getting a phone on contract.  The ACCC tried to enforce it, but the ACCC
> didn't
> |have a leg to stand on.
> |
> |As for the commentary on whether 1st & 2nd gen handsets would get the
> update,
> |let's have a discussion about this.
> |
> |Take a step back and look at your Lumia 800/900 "new" device for a minute.
> |The silicon running that device is 2+ years old, single core, no
> expandable
> |memory, 16GB of flash, with 512MB of RAM.
> |
> |As for the reason why existing devices couldn't be upgraded, you only need
> to
> |look at the "Shared Core" features to realise that WP8 Core has been
> "re-written"
> |from the ground up.  Basically putting existing gen 1 & gen 2 device
> |manufacturers & Microsoft in a position, where they need to create new
> |bootloaders to support "Secure Boot" & bitlocker encryption, even if they
> could
> |magically do that, they've then got to repartition the NAND which stores
> the OS,
> |RIL firmware, and even the separate update partition.  Try bundling that
> up
> into
> |an update and pushing it out to existing devices.
> |Short answer is you can't.  To repartition the NAND you need to supply a
> |complete device image (FFU), inside the FFU the partition maps are picked
> up by
> |"updatewp" aka Zune and your device is repartitioned ready for the update.
> One
> |little tidbit, you've just lost your ENTIRE OS image, data, SMS messages
> and the
> |Plants vs Zombie saved games you were hanging onto because you'd gotten
> past
> |the first level.  And we all know that you can't backup anything with WP7+
> devices
> |:)
> |
> |Now that you've got a device image, you have one, there are 15+ devices
> out
> |there, each device has the possibility of having a DIFFERENT image for
> each
> |Mobile Operator, with 300+ MO's out there, you are looking at creating
> 4500+
> |complete device images.  Do you have any idea how long it takes to create
> |complete device images?  Even once you've created one, the MO needs to
> TEST
> |the image, they find an issue, it's sent back to the handset maker to fix,
> if it's
> |Microsoft issue, then it goes back up the chain to fix a core issue, then
> another
> |image is created, and you repeat the process, over & over & over again.
> |
> |Miraculously the MO's have tested and approved the update, you have to
> cross
> |your fingers, legs, toes & basically anything else when the END USERS are
> |performing a COMPLETE device re-flash.  If there was one little stuff up,
> the user
> |failed to download the update correctly, user was updating his/her device
> with a
> |shitty 3rd party microUSB cable, they've now got a brick, a brick that
> can't be
> |recovered.  The only possibility of a recover is if they didn't stuff up
> the
> |bootloader flash, which is generally the first thing that gets flashed,
> which if
> |something was to go wrong, is the first thing to break.  Even having the
> ability to
> |JTAG a device, it won't recover it (if you are lucky to have a device that
> it's JTAG
> |isn't locked).
> |
> |Now, you've got a bricked device, that's out of warranty, but bricked
> because
> |Microsoft & the Handset manufacturers decided to push down an update, even
> |though you ticked a million boxes saying updating it was your fault, the
> end user
> |still has a whinge, complains to 10+ people about shitty company X & Y
> because
> |they bricked their phone, they'll also complain to the MO and most likely
> move to
> |another carrier.  If the update was somehow successful, how many people
> was
> |that end user tell and phrase Microsoft to?
> |Your answer is 1-2.  But you are still going to whinge about losing your
> Plants vs
> |Zombie game saves!
> |
> |Now you've got a commercial issue which is really a cluster f**k of a
> decision and
> |I've got no idea on how they make those.
> |
> |Make sense?
> |
> |
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
> |boun...@ozdotnet.com]
> |On Behalf Of Bill McCarthy
> |Sent: Wednesday, 27 June 2012 9:13 PM
> |To: 'ozDotNet'
> |Subject: RE: Windows Phone 8 announced
> |
> |Hi Stephen,
> |
> |Yes phones will be out of date, the question is whether it is months or
> years. In
> |Australia, typical contracts are 24 months, and I'm pretty sure the ACCC
> told
> |telcos they had to warranty devices for the length of the contracts. So
> two
> years
> |is fair to expect to be a current lifetime; obviously there will be
> hardware
> |improvements in that time, but the software and apps available you'd
> reasonably
> |expect to be current. Apple deal with that by controlling the release
> dates
> of
> |devices to a new device a year and OS support roughly of +1: hence you can
> be
> |sure to get two years of being current.  Android has been all over the
> place, but
> |the big players such as Samsung are also moving to give that period of
> currency
> |by providing OS updates (eg Galaxy II).  For Windows Phone there isn't
> that.
> |
> |Personally the thing about this I dislike the most is not the fate of my
> own phone
> |(I do like my lumia), but that I can no longer recommend to people they
> currently
> |buy a windows phone. This is the real shame. It'd be a lot better if
> people
> could
> |upgrade: would probably still be worth waiting for the newer devices for
> NFC.
> |The sooner they get the new devices out the better.
>
>
>


-- 
Meski

 http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv

"Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure,
you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills

Reply via email to