Thanks David, I'll look into those areas to try to find where the two apps differ.
-- noonie On 19 May 2014 18:27, David Rhys Jones <djones...@gmail.com> wrote: > is caching enabled for the Css in the server. [OutputCaching] > does the server have the permissions set to allow all in the machine / > server config. > > Add a web config into your css directory as mentioned here: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4375208/web-config-wildcards-in-location-and-authorization > > Davy > > Davy, > > "So you want to keep data which is local, only ever going to be local, > only needed locally, never accessed remotely, not WANTED to be made > available outside our building, which can only WEAKEN our security by being > off site, hosted offsite." BOFH: Simon Travaglia > > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:19 AM, noonie <neale.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I'm trying to figure out an issue that a user has reported. When they >> copy text from a Web page into Microsoft Word they are prompted for >> credentials on one site but not on another, similarly configured, site. >> >> Both sites are basic auth over https and both are ASP.net apps with very >> minor differences. The major differences are in their proxy configurations. >> I can understand why credentials are required but not why they seem to be >> automatically offered in one case but not in the other. >> >> Where can I find some documentation about how Windows and Office conspire >> together to grab CSS files so Word can decide what text formatting to offer? >> >> -- >> Regards, >> noonie >> > >
