> > Greg, am I correct in thinking azure table storage is only a cheaper > option when the number of reads is light? Preet mentions he will need > reporting and depending on how heavy those are hit azure table storage > could get expensive. >
Hmmm! I'm not sure as my demands have only reached the scale of "small office app". I have not investigated if the transfer costs can be significant over the storage costs when you push it hard. If anyone has actually pushed Azure Tables to industrial levels of usage, please let us know how it went -- *GK*
