Perfect for the government then lol On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:46 AM, David Connors <da...@connors.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 at 23:00 Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I forgot to mention ... don't forget Azure Table Storage! I've been >> really loving it recently and using it where a SQL Db would be overkill. >> The API is dead simple, vast capacity, cheap, and build and runtime >> dependencies are trivial -- *GregK* >> > > Here is a list of good things about table storage: > > - > > And here is a list of caveats for table storage: > > > - No support for complex queries. > - Indexes only exist as clustered indexes on the primary key. > - No support for computed aggregates. > - No support for joins. > - No support for server-side stored procedures. > - No ACLs support so security trimming must be done manually in the > application logic. > - No enforced schema or types. Tables may vary shape on a row-by-row > basis. > - No support for transactions. > > And slow. > > David. > > > -- > David Connors > da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61 417 189 363 >