I follow a number of CSS and javascript blogs, the boss thinks it's so I can stay ahead of the wave. The real reason is it gives me a chuckle every day when they try to solve a problem that they themselves inflicted by using a precompiler/framework that wasn't really needed in the first place.
A colleague is currently trying to implement a work around on a problem that is related to Less and knockout. Take a look at the less home page and see how they changed 3 lines of CSS into a whole mess of pre-compiler crap. *... .. / .... --- -.-. / .-.. . --. . .-. . / ... -.-. .. ... / -. .. -- .. ..- -- / . .-. ..- -.. .. - .. --- -. .. ... / .... .- -... . ... .-.-.-* On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:13 AM, DotNet Dude <adotnetd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:43 AM, David Connors <da...@connors.com> wrote: > >> 80% of the cost of an application starts after you finish dev and a well >> written modern, responsive web app costs very little to maintain (and works >> on all the things both network and device). >> > >> > Not in my experience. I'm yet to see one of these well written modern > responsive web apps you speak of. We normally get hired to go in and fix > the mess left by devs learning on the job. We also can't really blame the > devs for everything as with all the new frameworks and such coming out each > week (slight exaggeration) they are always learning on the job and can't be > expected to write good stuff. > >