I'm sure you have an answer for everything, but people in my area were being connected.
On 6 Jan 2018 6:39 AM, "Greg Low" <[email protected]> wrote: > "When the fttp values were being installed, and they said that they'd > passed 1000 homes but only connected 16, that is simply because homes had > over a year to switch over" > > > > It wasn't actually. The issue was that even if they wanted to, only 16 > could connect. They had passed places like unit blocks where no lead in > work had occurred. > > > > Regards, > > > > Greg > > > > Dr Greg Low > > > > 1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913 > fax > > SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com |http://greglow.me > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:ozdotnet-bounces@ > ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Tony Wright > *Sent:* Saturday, 6 January 2018 10:32 AM > *To:* ozDotNet <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [OT] Internet use on 4G LTE > > > > May as well have taken that $11 billion and made a big pile of money and > burnt it all. What a financially incompetent move. > > > > When you replace your modem you don't choose the same modem or even one > that is only a touch better than what you have, you get rid of your draft n > modem and replace it with an ac modem. The only thing they ended up > promising was the same speed that you could already get from adsl2. What a > disgrace. > > > > Now, back to Greg's comment. I actually agree that it should have been a > nation building project. Done one, done right. > > > > In Thailand there could be 100 fttp providers, but the consequence of that > is that there are thousands of fibre cables hanging off power lines in a > huge mess. Such is pure capitalism, where anyone is allowed to provide that > service. > > > > In Vietnam, they have 3 providers, but they still have 100s of fibre > cables neatly bundled again hanging oft power lines. > > > > When the fttp values were being installed, and they said that they'd > passed 1000 homes but only connected 16, that is simply because homes had > over a year to switch over. > > > > The nbn at the time was running 6 months behind. > > > > In my area, I was scheduled to receive nbn about a month after nbn 1 was > cancelled. I believe that would have happened 6 months later, as I had seen > the cabling being installed in Carlton just down the road. > > > > That was almost 3 years ago. Now, instead, they want to install hfc. Hfc > so far has failed. They have delayed the install because everyone that has > switched over had substandard failing nbn. Thanks to Liberal incompetence. > > > > It's an absolute disaster of Turnbulls making and it makes me mad. I would > have had pure nbn about 2 years ago, and now look at the state of things. > > > > My only respite is that I have existing 10 year old Telstra cable that > provides me with 114Mbps download and 2Mbps upload. > > > > This should be seen for what it is - an absolute failure of the Liberal > Party policy. > > > > > > > > On 5 Jan 2018 9:30 PM, "David Connors" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Fri., 5 Jan. 2018, 8:51 pm Ken Schaefer, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you being deliberately obtuse? In 2011 (per you link), NBN was going > to be fibre-to-the-premise. There was no technical need to buy any HFC or > copper, and as you say, compensation was for destroying an existing > business model. > > That's right however when the second definitive agreement was negotiated > the $11bln price stated the same, hence the price of the HFC and CAN were > $0. > > > > David > > -- > > David Connors > [email protected] | @davidconnors | https://t.me/davidconnors > | LinkedIn | +61 417 189 363 > > >
