Dear all,
I had a look at this site http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s411624.htm that
Denise posted on oxmid and was struck by this phrase contained in
it...
"The researchers say they don't know whether the increase in
Caesarean deliveries is responsible for the increase in deaths, or whether it's
because women are waiting longer to become pregnant."
It seems when all else fails to explain the "faults" of the
medicalization of childbirth then blame the women. ie now that they are old its
their fault they need sections or a dying. I was speaking with an "old woman" on
Wednesday who gave birth to her first baby nine days over her due date. She is
39 and I said to her (in jest) that she was not supposed to birth so well. I had
seen her in the clinic that morning were we discussed IOL for 12 days post term
but she looked like things were getting ready as her cervix was 1cm open and
long but soft and stretching forward and hse had been having irregulary
contractions overnight. Her baby was LOP. She went home to her accupuncturist
and then came back that night and gave birth 4 hours after arriving with a
cervix that was 3cms open. She had great faith in her body and baby and didn't
want to be induced etc etc. You see so many women induced at term plus a few
days and in her case would her outcome have been different if she took this
path?
Thanks for listening
Jackie
|
- Re: The rising maternal mortality study Jackie Kitschke
- Re: The rising maternal mortality study jireland
- Re: The rising maternal mortality study Andrea Bilcliff
- Re: The rising maternal mortality study Robin Moon
- Re: The rising maternal mortality study jireland
- Re: The rising maternal mortality study Lynne Staff