Diedre:
Were you replying to me? Obviously the inclusion of
vbac women as high risk is controversial, I specifically did not list risk
factors because the debate can get very very long and somewhat emotional. Just
for the record, I have supported many many women both at home and in hospital to
vaginal births after c/s and personally do not consider this a high risk labour
or pregnancy. I totally understand a woman not wanting to birth in a hospital
after having prior c/s. However, I do think consumers have to try to be
sensitive to the current insurance climate. I know that is hard especially if
you feel confident you are prepared to take the risks if the unimaginable
happens. But is not you who will be sued if it does(though you pay a horrible
price), it is your care provider and she will be sued by the authorities
regardless of your intent. When I was in seattle the practice I worked in
went from attending vbac at home to attending in hospital in 2001. This was
contentious at first, but the success rate was the same as before and the women
still had their known midwife; we went with them and managed the birth in the
hospital with early discharge. Yes it sucks but it can and does happen and is
still midwifery care. Our clients were not strapped to monitors and they birthed
in any position etc.. Our practice had hospital privileges. In the state of
Washington all childbearing women and their children were govt funded for health
insurance, so all women could choose homebirth: 2% did, midwives contracted with
health insurance companies to be preferred providers and you had to have
insurance (also provided/underwritten by that state)to be eligible. Our
transfer rate varied between 10 and 20%: higher if we were attending more
primips.
And yes there were 2 serious attempted homebirth
vbac's in the seattle area from 1996 to 2000 that went horribly wrong,
both involved midwives and clients (clients sought out the particular midwives
who would push the limits) who had pushed the limits of good midwifery care.
Everyone involved paid dearly. I did not work with either of these practices but
I had a dear friend who did.
Take a look at the guidelines etc. for midwifery
care in the Netherlands, it is quite rigorous the definition of what is normal
and it is my understanding that if the midwife says it is time to go to the
hospital, there is no negotiation, you go. It has been said many times this is
not Holland, clearly it isn't. Yes midwives in the Netherlands, Canada, NZ, and
yes the USA (don't know about the UK) do have prescriptive privileges, the
ability to order their own path tests, ultrasounds etc., in other word they are
autonomous practitioners, to change this I think you need to lobby for
legislative changes, these programs in NSW are working within current
legalities.
I do think it will be truly sad if these innovative
programs are stopped before they get off the ground. Midwives who a confident
and competent to attend births at home should not be restricted to opening their
own business, it should be a choice for them too. They should not have to put
their livelihoods at risk by practising without insurance. It is this insurance
issue that has led midwives to creating these innovative programs. At least that
is what i thought. Consumers should be able to have a homebirth on medicare
either through a hospital midwifery service or an independent midwife duely
accredited to receive a rebate. And if both of those are unacceptable to them,
then they can pay independently for the care giver of their choice. And many
more shoulds.
Personally i don't think any healthcare
practitioner working for a government health service should have to make
healthcare decisions based on anything but best practice. Unfortunately we have
accepted cost accounting into healthcare and many health decisions are based on
cost not best practice/evidence based care.
regards
marilyn
|
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Marilyn Kleidon
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Jo Bourne
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Andrea Robertson
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Lesley Kuliukas
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Jo Bourne
- RE: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Sally Westbury
- RE: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Jo Bourne
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Denise Hynd
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Marilyn Kleidon
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Dierdre Bowman
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Marilyn Kleidon
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Denise Hynd
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Marilyn Kleidon
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Dierdre Bowman
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care Dierdre Bowman
- Re: [ozmidwifery] New models of midwifery care jo hunter
- [ozmidwifery] Blur between obstetric and midwife... Sue Cookson
- [ozmidwifery] CMP homebirth Mary Murphy
- Re: [ozmidwifery] CMP homebirth Marilyn Kleidon
- Re: [ozmidwifery] CMP homebirth Marilyn Kleidon
- RE: [ozmidwifery] CMP homebirth Sally Westbury