At 18:48 +0800 29/11/03, Sally Westbury wrote:
>Dear Andrea, (Jo and Justine)
>
>
>To begin I am really concerned as a midwife and as a homebirth mother at the tone of 
>this letter and feel I want to respond to some comments that have been made.
>
>It is really important that these questions are asked in order to have thought 
>through as many possibilities as we are able, to end with the best solution. I 
>welcome and encourage all of us to think about this move to hospital based homebirth. 
>With this in mind I would like to raise my own personal perspective and concerns.
>
>Why are we modelling a service based on a UK model when we have a model that works 
>here in Western Australia?? (I would be greatly distressed if our services homebirth 
>rate was 43% I do acknowledge that given their high risk setting this may be adequate 
>but the women that will be using this service will be screened as low risk.)The 
>Community Midwifery Program has a homebirth rate of 72%!! Why is no-one looking to 
>our own home grown homebirth service?
>
>To hear that a hospital based caseload midwife is no different from an independent 
>midwife is a surprise to me. There great differences about an independent midwife who 
>employed by a women and a hospital based midwife who is employed by a hospital. The 
>greatest difference is who we work for.
>
>Surely a safe midwifery practice has it own guidelines for consultation and transfer? 
>The possibility that this service is being set up to be guided/supervied by 
>obstetrics is of great concern? (We have seen how this fails in birth centres that 
>have high transfer rate in a medical climate that seems to wish our great birth 
>centres to fail) Why not midwifery guidelines? A midwife should have midwifery 
>guidelines. These do not automatically agree with obstetric guideline but does not 
>mean that she is taking risks with the women's health! For example some midwives 
>support VBAC at home.. this does not agree with obstetric guidelines but does not put 
>a woman's health at risk or risk the midwives legal safety!!
>
>'
>
>The big advantage of the hospital based home birth service is that it will
>
>be free. Women who cannpt afford a private practitioner will not be
>
>excluded from having a home birth as happens now. THe people involved in
>
>setting up this service have vast experience of home birth in the UK and
>
>elsehwere and are dedicated to providing the best woman-centreds care they
>
>can. They wouldn't want anything else!
>
>We need this propject to go ahead, and quickly. At the moment we have no
>
>homebirth service that provides safety for the woman in terms of insurance
>
>and this is a worry for both women and their midwives. Let's all support
>
>this model rather than be trying to pick holes in it before the facts are
>
>known and it has even had a chance to be tried and tested! There are some
>
>very dedicated midwives out there who are trying to create the best birth
>
>options for women and they need out support "
>
>I would like to point out that 'we' do have a free homebirth service that is 
>community based, supported by state and federal funding and fully insured. We do have 
>in now in Western Australia.
>
>Why are we not looking to our own. We have a model that has been tried and tested in 
>Australia. Why are 'we' not looking to our own for information and support.
>
>The Community Midwifery Program has worked long and hard to maintain autonomous 
>practice whilst working within agreed guidelines to provide free homebirth services.
>
>What political campaign is happening that we may end up with a hospital based 
>homebirth service instigated by imported experts, supervised by obstrtic experts 
>rather than the community based model established by local activist and midwives 
>which is driven by midwifery models of best practice and women's needs.
>
>So there it is� my personal perspective.
>
>I am supportive of government funding of homebirth but not at any cost.
>
>Sally Westbury
>
>Homebirth Mother/Activist since 1984
>
>Homebirth Midwive since 1992


-- 
Jo Bourne
Virtual Artists Pty Ltd
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit <http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to