Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 23, 2011, at 5:18 PM, David Barrett <dbarr...@quinthar.com> wrote: >>> On 01/23/2011 12:25 PM, Julian Cain wrote: >>>>>> Of course, we do it in RELOAD(p2psip-base) and it works very well. >>>>> >>>>> How well is "very well"? If you don't mind sharing, what's the largest >>>>> real-world RELOAD deployment, and what fraction of nodes that attempted >>>>> to establish a direct connection were in fact able to do so? (Based on >>>>> hard data from live testing, not estimates.) I haven't followed p2psip >>>>> for a couple years, I'm eager to hear how it's progressed! >>>> >>>> You can find out yourself this year at IETF. We'll be performing >>>> demonstrations, etc. >>> >>> Hm, do you mean it hasn't really been tested yet at scale, but will >>> start large-scale testing later this year? >>> >>> If so, by "it works very well" do you actually mean "I hope it'll work >>> really well, but we haven't actually tested it yet"? >> >> It's tested and works very well. There are some open source implementations >> and many closed ones. > > Ok, so it's been tested and works very well, good. Can you quantify or > support this statement in any way? Do you have any data whatsoever from > this testing to share? > > Basically, is there any open-source implementation of P2P-SIP that has > been tested on >1000 real world nodes (not PlanetLab, not just > universities -- actual DSL and home connections) in such a way that > actually measured the success rate of direct connectivity? > > If not, why not, and when? These questions would be better asked/answered on the p2psip list. > > -david > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers@lists.zooko.com http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
