I was hopeful. I think you understood my point. I contacted Eben, and he has clarified that my hope is not well placed.
Looks like we need to look to other solutions. Thanks Zenaan On 8/13/14, Aymeric Vitte <[email protected]> wrote: > Then probably I misunderstood your point, what was it? > > Regards, > > Le 12/08/2014 16:24, Zenaan Harkness a écrit : >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Eben Moglen <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 07:12:11 -0700 >> Subject: Re: Fwd: [p2p-hackers] torrent-live >> To: [email protected] >> >> Under US law there is no such thing as a "fair use percentage." Fair >> use is a defense to claims of infringement, and the court is supposed >> to determine whether an otherwise infringing use is not infringing >> because "fair," based on weighing an uncertain number of factors >> (including, the statute says, but not limited to, the nature and >> extent of the use, and the interference with commercial exploitation >> of the copyright) in a standardless, one-of-a-kind way. Publishers >> have long argued, for example, that even one line of a poem cannot be >> "fair use." But no one else believes that, and some examples contrary >> could be given. >> >> So there's no algorithm to duplicate in code. >> >> E >> _______________________________________________ >> p2p-hackers mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers > > -- > Peersm : http://www.peersm.com > torrent-live: https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live > node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor > GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms > > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers > _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zooko.com/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers
