Define "most". If you mean more than 70% (not sure of the exact percentage), I would have to disagree.
Thanks -greg > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Daniel Stutzbach > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 1:29 PM > To: Peer-to-peer development. > Subject: Re: Dijjer and Freenet (RE: [p2p-hackers] clustering) > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 10:20:02AM -0800, Serguei Osokine wrote: > > You mean you did not expect to grow Dijjer and Freenet beyond > > 512K nodes before you'd have to replace all the client code? With > > today's P2P network sizes it might be a good idea to have the code > > that would be ready to scale into high millions at least - you never > > know when you might need it... :-) > > Most users upgrade their software within 2 months [1], so replacing > all the client code actually isn't that hard. I'm assuming the > network is robust enough to keep working if a small percentage of > clients have the old code. > > [1] = based on measurements of LimeWire Ultrapeer users. Amir > H. Rasti, Daniel Stutzbach, Reza Rejaie, "On the Long-term Evolution > of the Two-Tier Gnutella Overlay", to appear at the Global Internet > Symposium 2006. > > -- > Daniel Stutzbach Computer Science Ph.D Student > http://www.barsoom.org/~agthorr University of Oregon > _______________________________________________ > p2p-hackers mailing list > p2p-hackers@zgp.org > http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers > _______________________________________________ > Here is a web page listing P2P Conferences: > http://www.neurogrid.net/twiki/bin/view/Main/PeerToPeerConferences _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers@zgp.org http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ Here is a web page listing P2P Conferences: http://www.neurogrid.net/twiki/bin/view/Main/PeerToPeerConferences
