Oops, I meant to send this to the list.  Sorry, Gerald.  :-)
---------------------- Forwarded by Wesley Sheldahl/Lex/Lexmark on 11/15/2001
02:38 PM ---------------------------


Wesley Sheldahl
11/15/2001 09:22 AM

To:   "Gerald Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> @ LEXMTA
cc:

Subject:  Re: P5EE::Util::DateTime (?!?)  (Document link: Wesley Sheldahl)

I've mostly used Date::Calc in the past (since I got started with it probably
before Class::Date was around), but the Class::Date docs say that as of version
1.08 it no longer requires a C compiler, as long as you move its Date.pm file to
the right place.

This list is the first place I've seen mention of Time::Piece; it also looks
pretty useful.  The biggest decision for this group will probably be deciding on
an API.  Eventually.  Maybe a consensus will emerge from the actual code that
gets submitted to P5EE, and we can take this particular vote that way.  :-)

Wes



"Gerald Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/15/2001 12:54:34
AM

To:   "Chris Winters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "brian
      moseley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Gunther Birznieks"
      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Wesley Sheldahl/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject:  Re: P5EE::Util::DateTime (?!?)


>
> I assume that this is an ordered preference in case the APIs overlap. so
> Class::Date will be used first, then Date::Parse, then Date::Format
>

I didn't tried it, but from the docs of Class::Date it should be possible to
utilize Date::Parse for it's parseing. So there should be no need for using
Date::Parse directly. So interface should always be via Class::Date. Also I
don't see what you can do with Date::Format, what can't be done with
Class::Date. So (in case I am not wrong) we should only use Class::Date and
access Date::Parse only via the Class::Date interface.

Gerald



-------------------------------------------------------------
Gerald Richter    ecos electronic communication services gmbh
Internetconnect * Webserver/-design/-datenbanken * Consulting

Post:       Tulpenstrasse 5         D-55276 Dienheim b. Mainz
E-Mail:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]         Voice:    +49 6133 925131
WWW:        http://www.ecos.de      Fax:      +49 6133 925152
-------------------------------------------------------------









Reply via email to