On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Stephen Adkins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It says in the documentation for Class::Date that it was derived
> from Time::Object (from the Time::Piece distribution).
>
> Does anyone know why?
> Why was Time::Object not simply extended?
We had a fight about the code. His code is horrible, really quite ugly. So
I wouldn't accept his patches. We also fought about what should be in
the project's scope. I wanted Time::Object(Piece) to be simple, and he
wanted it to do all sorts of things like be able to automatically handle
MySQL's date format (?!!).
--
<Matt/>
/|| ** Founder and CTO ** ** http://axkit.com/ **
//|| ** AxKit.com Ltd ** ** XML Application Serving **
// || ** http://axkit.org ** ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP **
// \\| // ** mod_perl news and resources: http://take23.org **
\\//
//\\
// \\
