Now that we have a name for p5ee, are we going to call the components "beans" or "pearls" or ????
--- Stephen Adkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Well I really didn't expect the near-unanimity on > any one name > that we got. It appears that most of us would be > happiest with > > P5EE - Perl 5 Enterprise Environment > > which suits me fine. > > So unless we get some late-breaking support for > "Extensions" or > someone clues us in to a strong historical > preference within the > greater Perl community for "Extensions", we'll go > with the new > name. > > Stephen > > P.S. See some extra comments below. > > At 12:48 AM 11/16/2001 +0800, Gunther Birznieks > wrote: > .... > >And truth be told I don't care either way. But I > think Enterprise > >Environment feels more like that this is. But I > think your particular > >interest in the P5EE namespace being used for all > things P5EE is definately > >more in line with the extension side. > > I really am all in favor of simply naming existing > modules outside > the P5EE namespace as being "P5EE-recommended" or > whatever. > > >I think this initiative is more than the p5EE > extension set anyway. I do > >think a lot of it is documenting what exists out > there now to write > >enterprise apps (eg POE, various XML utilities, > etc) > > I totally agree with this, which is why > documentation is what I've been > doing a lot of. > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Find the one for you at Yahoo! Personals http://personals.yahoo.com
