On 9 May 2014, at 11:24 am, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi All, > > We confirmed a problem when we performed "clean up" of the Master/Slave > resource in Pacemaker1.0. > When this problem occurs, "probe" processing is not carried out. > > I registered the problem with Bugzilla. > * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5211 > > In addition, I wrote the method of "clean up" avoiding a problem for Bugzilla. > But this method may not be usable depending on the combination of resources. > > I request improvement if I can revise this problem in Pacemaker1.0 in > community.
Do you guys have any timeframe for moving away from 1.0.x? The 1.1 series is over 4 years old now and quite usable :-) There is really a (low) limit to how much effort I can put into support for it. > > * But this problem is improved in Pacemaker1.1 and does not seem to occur. > > Best Regards, > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
