On 14 May 2014, at 3:53 pm, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for comments. > >> Do you guys have any timeframe for moving away from 1.0.x? >> The 1.1 series is over 4 years old now and quite usable :-) >> >> There is really a (low) limit to how much effort I can put into support for >> it. > > We gradually move from Pacemaker1.0 to Pacemaker1.1, too. > > I thought that I should record that there was this problem with Pacemaker1.0. > And I registered a problem and reported it. > (possibly the user who is behind with a shift to Pacemaker1.1 may encounter > the same problem.) > > It is not necessary at all to revise it for Pacemaker1.0.
Maybe we need to add KnownIssues.md to the repo for anyone thats slow to update. Are there any 1.0 bugs that really really need fixing or shall we move them all to the KnownIssues file?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
