https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116238

Steve Linabery <slina...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?(p...@draigbrady.com)



--- Comment #12 from Steve Linabery <slina...@redhat.com> ---
I created a POC openstack-tempest RPM that has two subpackages,
openstack-tempest-icehouse and openstack-tempest-juno. I'd appreciate some
sanity checking of the spec.

http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/openstack-tempest-20140703-2.fc20.src.rpm

NB: The Source1 for the juno tarball does not point to an actual upstream
tarball. I merely retarred the icehouse tarball indicated in Source0. In
practice, I think we'd tag (in https://github.com/redhat-openstack/tempest) the
icehouse branch and the juno branch with tags that reflect the Version, for
example 'openstack-tempest-icehouse-20140703' and
'openstack-tempest-juno-20140703'. At this point there is no 'juno' branch in
redhat-openstack/tempest, but I used the ginned-up Source1 tarball to show how
we would handle subpackages. If we go forward with this strategy, the initial
cut will have only the icehouse tarball.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to