https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976012
--- Comment #19 from Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@redhat.com> --- > You should consider converting any build dependencies that are located by > Meson via pkgconfig to use pkgconfig() names instead of their package names. > That way you'll always get them, even if they change package names. true, though in this case: wireplumber wants *a lot* of .pc files which are effectively all provided by glib2-devel and gobject-introspection-devel. Switching to pkgconfig means either only checking separately for all of those, making the spec file harder to maintain, or just some of those knowing that they're in the same package anyway. Both option are IMO worse than requiring the package name directly. Only systemd and lua-devel could meaningfully be switched to the pkgconfig check here without any drawbacks. > These should all be in a libs subpackage, similar to how it was done for > pipewire itself. That makes the WirePlumber libraries safe for multi-lib, > which may be needed with multi-lib PipeWire too. Done, same URLs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
